Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Classification of samples from NMR-based metabolomics using principal components analysis and partial least squares with uncertainty estimation.
Rocha, Werickson Fortunato de Carvalho; Sheen, David A; Bearden, Daniel W.
Afiliación
  • Rocha WFC; Division of Chemical Metrology, National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology -INMETRO, Duque de Caxias, RJ, 25250-020, Brazil.
  • Sheen DA; Chemical Sciences Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA. david.sheen@nist.gov.
  • Bearden DW; Chemical Sciences Division, Hollings Marine Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC, 29412, USA.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 410(24): 6305-6319, 2018 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30043113
ABSTRACT
Recent progress in metabolomics has been aided by the development of analysis techniques such as gas and liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS and LC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The vast quantities of data produced by these techniques has resulted in an increase in the use of machine algorithms that can aid in the interpretation of this data, such as principal components analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS). Techniques such as these can be applied to biomarker discovery, interlaboratory comparison, and clinical diagnoses. However, there is a lingering question whether the results of these studies can be applied to broader sets of clinical data, usually taken from different data sources. In this work, we address this question by creating a metabolomics workflow that combines a previously published consensus analysis procedure ( https//doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.12.010 ) with PCA and PLS models using uncertainty analysis based on bootstrapping. This workflow is applied to NMR data that come from an interlaboratory comparison study using synthetic and biologically obtained metabolite mixtures. The consensus analysis identifies trusted laboratories, whose data are used to create classification models that are more reliable than without. With uncertainty analysis, the reliability of the classification can be rigorously quantified, both for data from the original set and from new data that the model is analyzing. Graphical abstract ᅟ.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética / Metabolómica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética / Metabolómica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article