Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction With Submuscular-Dermal-Mesh Pocket.
Bonomi, Stefano; Sala, Laura; Gennaro, Massimiliano; Ricci, Cristian; Cortinovis, Umberto.
Afiliación
  • Bonomi S; From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, and.
  • Sala L; From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, and.
  • Gennaro M; Breast Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Ricci C; Centre of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
  • Cortinovis U; From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, and.
Ann Plast Surg ; 82(1): 19-27, 2019 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30247191
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite skin-sparing mastectomy techniques have significantly improved reconstructive options and aesthetic outcomes, patients with large and ptotic breasts remain a challenging group to treat satisfactorily. The Wise-pattern skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM) has been designed for this kind of patients but is not without morbidity. To improve safety, the authors reviewed their experience with a modified SRM and immediate 1-stage implant-based breast reconstruction, using a synthetic absorbable mesh combined with a dermal flap.

METHODS:

A retrospective review was undertaken to identify women with medium to large ptotic breast and medium minimally ptotic breast who had undergone SRM and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using definitive anatomical gel implant, de-epithelialized dermal flap, and absorbable synthetic mesh, between October 2014 and December 2016. Patient demographics were queried, and complication rates, aesthetic outcomes, and patients satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS:

Sixty-two procedures of SRM were performed in 56 patients. Forty-five women received contralateral symmetrization. Twenty-one overall complications occurred in 16 patients. Statistical correlation between risk factors and complications onset was assessed. Body mass index resulted the most substantial risk factor (P = 0.0028) for developing complications, whereas preoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.0050) and comorbidities (P = 0.0117) played a decent role. Smoking attitude (P = 0.1122), age (P = 0.9990), and implant weight (P = 0.1583) did not result as significant risk factors. The reconstructive outcomes were good to excellent in 92.8%, with patient satisfaction ranking very to highly satisfied in 84%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The authors' series suggests that SRM with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction can be easily performed when an appropriate SRM pattern is designed, providing complete implant coverage with submuscular-dermal-mesh pocket.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mallas Quirúrgicas / Neoplasias de la Mama / Mastectomía Subcutánea / Satisfacción del Paciente / Mamoplastia / Implantación de Mama Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mallas Quirúrgicas / Neoplasias de la Mama / Mastectomía Subcutánea / Satisfacción del Paciente / Mamoplastia / Implantación de Mama Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article