Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Confirming the factor structure of a generic quality of life instrument among pre-treatment substance use disorder patients.
Muller, Ashley Elizabeth; Skurtveit, Svetlana; Clausen, Thomas.
Afiliación
  • Muller AE; Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb 1039 Blinder, 0136, Oslo, Norway. aemu@fhi.no.
  • Skurtveit S; Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb 1039 Blinder, 0136, Oslo, Norway.
  • Clausen T; Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 17(1): 84, 2019 May 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31101049
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Quality of life (QoL) is a patient-reported outcome of increasing importance in the substance use disorder (SUD) treatment field, and impaired QoL may be an important impetus for treatment uptake. Instruments and methodologies abound, precluding comparison, as does a dearth of population norms. The QOL10 is a generic, overall QoL tool containing ten items and with simple scoring procedures. It is therefore a potential alternative to the gold standard WHOQOL-BREF. This study aimed to assess the two-factor structure of the QOL10 that has been suggested by a previous exploratory factor analysis.

METHODS:

Adults entering 21 participating inpatient or outpatient SUD treatment were recruited to join a national longitudinal cohort study. 531 completed the QOL10 at treatment entry and were included in the analysis. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to confirm the model fit of a two-factor structure, and the scaling qualities of the QOL10 were reported.

RESULTS:

According to the SEM analysis, the QOL10 was comprised of one latent variable measuring social QoL, and one measuring global QoL, and all ten items were retained. Goodness of fit tests included root mean square of approximation = 0.063, 90% CI 0.050-0.076; normed-fit index = 0.919; and comparative fit index = 0.943.

CONCLUSIONS:

The QOL10 should be considered when clinicians in the SUD treatment field need a short, valid instrument that measures both global QoL and social QoL, with minimum respondent and administrator burden. The social domain is of particular utility and may be used as a stand-alone instrument. Test-retest reliability should be established in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Encuestas y Cuestionarios / Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Encuestas y Cuestionarios / Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article