Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The short-term physiological impact of switching reusable silicone hydrogel wearers into a hydrogel daily disposable multifocal.
Moezzi, Amir M; Varikooty, Jalaiah; Luensmann, Doerte; Schulze, Marc-Matthias; Ng, Alison; Karkkainen, Thomas; Xu, Jing; Jones, Lyndon.
Afiliación
  • Moezzi AM; Centre for Ocular Research & Education (CORE, formerly Centre for Contact Lens Research), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Varikooty J; Centre for Ocular Research & Education (CORE, formerly Centre for Contact Lens Research), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Luensmann D; Centre for Ocular Research & Education (CORE, formerly Centre for Contact Lens Research), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Schulze MM; Centre for Ocular Research & Education (CORE, formerly Centre for Contact Lens Research), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ng A; Centre for Ocular Research & Education (CORE, formerly Centre for Contact Lens Research), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Karkkainen T; Research and Development, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Xu J; Research and Development, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Jones L; Centre for Ocular Research & Education (CORE, formerly Centre for Contact Lens Research), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 13: 1193-1202, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31371916
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To evaluate ocular physiological responses to etafilcon A multifocal (etMF) daily disposable (DD) lenses after 4 weeks of wear, when switching from habitual silicone hydrogel (SiHy) daily wear.

Method:

A single-arm, open-label, bilateral dispensing study was conducted in 39 habitual spherical SiHy wearers (14 hyperopes; 25 myopes). Clinical visits occurred with habitual SiHy (control) at baseline and after 4 weeks of etMF DD open-eye lens wear at exit. Objective limbal/bulbar hyperemia using the Oculus K5M (0-4) and subjective grading of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) (0-4) were tested for non-inferiority (NI), using a margin of 1 grade. Corneal thickness along a 10 mm cord was measured using the Visante OCT and tested for NI using a 30 µm margin. Corneal staining area was graded (0-100%).

Results:

The least-square mean differences (LSMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) between etMF DD and habitual SiHy in central and peripheral corneal thickness (µm) were 3.64 (-2.0, 9.29) and 3.0 (-7.72, 13.72) in hyperopic, and 3.56 (-0.66, 7.78) and 6.40 (-1.62, 14.42) in myopic subjects. The LSMD (95% CI) for bulbar and limbal hyperemia were -0.08 (-0.19, 0.02) and -0.01 (-0.12, 0.09) in hyperopes, and 0.04 (-0.03, 0.12) and 0.04 (-0.04, 0.11) in myopes. The LSMD (95% CI) for LWE were 0.11 (-0.39, 0.60) and 0.30 (-0.07, 0.67) for hyperopes and myopes, respectively.

Conclusions:

No clinically significant differences in a variety of physiological responses were found when habitual reusable SiHy daily wear subjects were refitted into hydrogel etMF, when the subjects were followed for 4 weeks.
Palabras clave