Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of diabetes mellitus on immature platelet fraction and its association with coronary artery disease.
Verdoia, Monica; Nardin, Matteo; Rolla, Roberta; Pergolini, Patrizia; Suryapranata, Harry; Kedhi, Elvin; Carriero, Alessandro; De Luca, Giuseppe.
Afiliación
  • Verdoia M; Department of Cardiology, Ospedale "Maggiore della Carità", Eastern Piedmont University, Novara, Italy.
  • Nardin M; Department of Cardiology, Ospedale "Maggiore della Carità", Eastern Piedmont University, Novara, Italy.
  • Rolla R; Department of Medicine, ASST "Spedali Civili", University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
  • Pergolini P; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ospedale "Maggiore della Carità", Eastern Piedmont University, Novara, Italy.
  • Suryapranata H; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ospedale "Maggiore della Carità", Eastern Piedmont University, Novara, Italy.
  • Kedhi E; Department of Cardiology, UMC St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Carriero A; Division of Cardiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • De Luca G; AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 36(4): e3290, 2020 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31943700
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Higher prothrombotic status and alterations in platelet function and thrombopoiesis are associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). We assessed the impact of diabetes and glucose control on the immature platelet fraction (IPF) and their relationship with prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS:

Consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography were included. Significant CAD was defined as at least one vessel stenosis greater than 50%. IPF levels were measured at admission by routine blood cells count (A Sysmex XE-2100).

RESULTS:

We included 1781 patients, of whom 660 (37.1%) suffered from diabetes. Diabetes was associated with advanced age and a higher cardiovascular risk profile. No difference in the mean values of IPF were observed between patients with or without DM (3.6 ± 2.5 vs 3.5 ± 2.5, P = 0.39) and neither in the rate of patients with IPF above the median (2.9%) (51.6% vs 50.6%, P = 0.73). In patients with DM, the IPF levels did not relate with glucose control parameters (glycaemia r = -0.024, P = 0.54, glycosylated haemoglobin r = 0.11, P = 0.72). The prevalence of CAD was significantly lower in patients with DM and IPF greater than the median (80.5% vs 86.5%, P = 0.04, adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 0.57[0.36-0.91], P = 0.02), while not left main/three-vessel CAD (36.9% vs 38.2%, P = 0.75, adjusted OR [95%CI] = 0.91[0.64-1.28], P = 0.90).

CONCLUSION:

In the present study, neither DM nor glucose control are independent predictors of IPF above the median. In patients with DM, higher IPF levels were associated with a lower prevalence of CAD and with a similar extent of severe CAD and angiographic findings. Therefore, until new data become available, elevated IPF should not be systematically applied on a large scale as cardiovascular risk marker in patients with diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plaquetas / Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Biomarcadores / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plaquetas / Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Biomarcadores / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article