Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta-analysis.
Yoon, Byung-Ho; Park, In Keun; Kim, Youngwoo; Oh, Hyoung-Keun; Choo, Suk Kyu; Sung, Yerl-Bo.
Afiliación
  • Yoon BH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Park IK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim Y; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Oh HK; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, South Korea.
  • Choo SK; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, South Korea.
  • Sung YB; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. ybs58@paik.ac.kr.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 141(2): 225-233, 2021 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32388648
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Nonunion is the most frequent cause of reoperation and is associated with high morbidity after distal femur fracture (DFF). We examined the rates of nonunion requiring reoperation after fixation for DFF using a locking compression plate (LCP) or retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN).

METHODS:

We included four studies comparing LCP and RIMN and 38 single-cohort studies reporting LCP or RIMN. In total, 2156 femurs were included and 166 non-unions were detected. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the four comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the 38 articles to estimate the nonunion rate. We performed sensitivity analysis by comparing studies using LCP with less invasive surgical systems (LISS) with those that used RIMN.

RESULTS:

The pairwise meta-analysis showed a similar nonunion rate between the groups [odds ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.11, p = 0.633]. According to proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of nonunion was 5% (95% CI 4-7) totally, 6% (95% CI 4-8) in the LCP group, and 4% (95% CI 2-6) in the RIMN group (heterogeneity p = 0.105). According to the sensitivity analysis, there was no difference in the union rate. The pooled prevalence of nonunion from sensitivity analysis was 4 % (95% CI, 3-5); it was 4% (95% CI, 3-6) in LCP with LISS and was 4% (95% CI, 2-6) in RIMN group (heterogeneity p = 0.941).

CONCLUSION:

Approximately 5% of patients who underwent LCP or RIMN fixation developed nonunion. Therefore, LCP and RIMN are effective DFF techniques and mastering one of them is essential.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Clavos Ortopédicos / Placas Óseas / Fracturas del Fémur / Fijación Interna de Fracturas Tipo de estudio: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Clavos Ortopédicos / Placas Óseas / Fracturas del Fémur / Fijación Interna de Fracturas Tipo de estudio: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article