Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical outcome of robot-assisted residual mass resection in metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor.
Blok, Joost M; van der Poel, Henk G; Kerst, J Martijn; Bex, Axel; Brouwer, Oscar R; Bosch, J L H Ruud; Horenblas, Simon; Meijer, Richard P.
Afiliación
  • Blok JM; Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.m.blok-3@umcutrecht.nl.
  • van der Poel HG; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.m.blok-3@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Kerst JM; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Bex A; Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Brouwer OR; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Bosch JLHR; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Horenblas S; Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Meijer RP; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
World J Urol ; 39(6): 1969-1976, 2021 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32955662
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the outcome of robot-assisted residual mass resection (RA-RMR) in nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) patients with residual tumor following chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Retrospective medical chart analysis of all patients with NSGCT undergoing RA-RMR at two tertiary referral centers between January 2007 and April 2019. Patients were considered for RA-RMR in case of a residual tumor between 10 and 50 mm at cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) imaging located ventrally or laterally from the aorta or vena cava, with normalized tumor markers following completion of chemotherapy, and no history of retroperitoneal surgery.

RESULTS:

A total of 45 patients were included in the analysis. The Royal Marsden stage before chemotherapy was IIA in 13 (28.9%), IIB in 16 (35.6%), IIC in 3 (6.7%) and IV in 13 patients (28.9%). The median residual tumor size was 1.9 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 1.4-2.8; range 1.0-5.0). Five procedures (11.1%) were converted to an open procedure due to a vascular injury (n = 2), technical difficulty (n = 2) or tumor debris leakage (n = 1). A postoperative adverse event occurred in two patients (4.4%). Histopathology showed teratoma, necrosis and viable cancer in 29 (64.4%), 14 (31.1%), and two patients (4.4%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 41 months (IQR 22-70), one patient (2.2%) relapsed in the retroperitoneum. The one- and 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 98%.

CONCLUSION:

RA-RMR is an appropriate treatment option in selected patients, potentially providing excellent cure rates with minimal morbidity. Long-term outcome data are needed to further support this strategy and determine inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Testiculares / Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Testiculares / Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article