Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analgesic Efficacy of "Burst" and Tonic (500 Hz) Spinal Cord Stimulation Patterns: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study.
Eldabe, Sam; Duarte, Rui; Gulve, Ashish; Williams, Heather; Garner, Fay; Brookes, Morag; Madzinga, Grace; Buchser, Eric; Batterham, Alan M.
Afiliación
  • Eldabe S; Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Duarte R; Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Gulve A; Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Williams H; Department of Pain Management, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK.
  • Garner F; Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Brookes M; Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Madzinga G; Department of Clinical Research Services, ICON Group, Sydney, Australia.
  • Buchser E; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, EHC - Hôpital de Morges, Morges, Switzerland.
  • Batterham AM; School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Neuromodulation ; 24(3): 471-478, 2021 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33251662
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy in reducing pain intensity in adult subjects suffering from chronic back and leg pain of burst (BST) and tonic sub-threshold stimulation at 500 Hz (T500) vs. sham stimulation delivered by a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) device capable of automated postural adjustment of current intensity. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A multicentre randomized double-blind, three-period, three-treatment, crossover study was undertaken at two centers in the United Kingdom. Patients who had achieved stable pain relief with a conventional SCS capable of automated postural adjustment of current intensity were randomized to sequences of BST, T500, and sham SCS with treatment order balanced across the six possible sequences. A current leakage was programmed into the implantable pulse generator (IPG) in the sham period. The primary outcome was patient reported pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS:

Nineteen patients were enrolled and randomized. The mean reduction in pain with T500 was statistically significantly greater than that observed with either sham (25%; 95% CI, 8%-38%; p = 0.008) or BST (28%; 95% CI, 13%-41%; p = 0.002). There were no statistically significant differences in pain VAS for BST versus Sham (5%; 95% CI, -13% to 27%; p = 0.59). Exploratory sub-group analyses by study site and sex were also conducted for the T500 vs. sham and BST versus sham comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings suggest a superior outcome versus sham from T500 stimulation over BST stimulation and a practical equivalence between BST and sham in a group of subjects with leg and back pain habituated to tonic SCS and having achieved a stable status with stimulation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor Crónico / Estimulación de la Médula Espinal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor Crónico / Estimulación de la Médula Espinal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article