Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration is useful in pancreatic cysts smaller than 3 cm.
Faias, Sandra; Cravo, Marília; Pereira da Silva, João; Chaves, Paula; Dias Pereira, A.
Afiliación
  • Faias S; Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil EPE, Rua Prof Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal. sandrarfaias@hotmail.com.
  • Cravo M; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. sandrarfaias@hotmail.com.
  • Pereira da Silva J; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Av. Carlos Teixeira, 3, 2670-000, Loures, Portugal.
  • Chaves P; Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Dias Pereira A; Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil EPE, Rua Prof Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 20(1): 413, 2020 Dec 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33297971
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In current guidelines, endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is recommended in pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) with worrisome features (size ≥ 3 cm, mural nodule, or Wirsung dilation).

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the diagnostic ability and assess the accuracy of EUS-FNA in PCLs smaller than 3 cm.

METHODS:

Retrospective study of PCLs < 3 cm (2007-2016) undergoing EUS-FNA. Clinical, EUS and pancreatic cystic fluid (PCF) data were prospectively registered. Performance of EUS-FNA with PCF analysis for the detection of malignancy and accuracy in surgical cohort were analyzed.

RESULTS:

We evaluated 115 patients with PCLs < 3 cm who underwent EUS-FNA. 19 patients underwent surgery, 7 had malignant, 8 pre-malignant, and the remaining 4 benign lesions. Mass/mural nodule was present in 27% of the cysts, CEA level was higher than 192 ng/mL in 39.4% of patients, and only 35% of cytologic samples were informative. Nevertheless, additional FNA for PCF analysis improved the diagnostic performance of EUS imaging-AUC = 0.80 versus AUC = 60.

CONCLUSION:

EUS-FNA has good accuracy in PCLs < 3 cm. It confirmed malignancy even in lesions without worrisome features (nodule/mass), with two in every five resections showing high-risk/malignant lesions. EUS-FNA was also useful to diagnose benign cysts, possibly allowing surveillance to be stopped in one in every five patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quiste Pancreático / Neoplasias Pancreáticas Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quiste Pancreático / Neoplasias Pancreáticas Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article