Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays.
Riepe, Tabea V; Khan, Mubeen; Roosing, Susanne; Cremers, Frans P M; 't Hoen, Peter A C.
Afiliación
  • Riepe TV; Centre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Khan M; Department of Human Genetics and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Roosing S; Department of Human Genetics and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Cremers FPM; Department of Human Genetics and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • 't Hoen PAC; Department of Human Genetics and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hum Mutat ; 42(7): 799-810, 2021 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33942434
ABSTRACT
Hereditary disorders are frequently caused by genetic variants that affect pre-messenger RNA splicing. Though genetic variants in the canonical splice motifs are almost always disrupting splicing, the pathogenicity of variants in the noncanonical splice sites (NCSS) and deep intronic (DI) regions are difficult to predict. Multiple splice prediction tools have been developed for this purpose, with the latest tools employing deep learning algorithms. We benchmarked established and deep learning splice prediction tools on published gold standard sets of 71 NCSS and 81 DI variants in the ABCA4 gene and 61 NCSS variants in the MYBPC3 gene with functional assessment in midigene and minigene splice assays. The selection of splice prediction tools included CADD, DSSP, GeneSplicer, MaxEntScan, MMSplice, NNSPLICE, SPIDEX, SpliceAI, SpliceRover, and SpliceSiteFinder-like. The best-performing splice prediction tool for the different variants was SpliceRover for ABCA4 NCSS variants, SpliceAI for ABCA4 DI variants, and the Alamut 3/4 consensus approach (GeneSplicer, MaxEntScacn, NNSPLICE and SpliceSiteFinder-like) for NCSS variants in MYBPC3 based on the area under the receiver operator curve. Overall, the performance in a real-time clinical setting is much more modest than reported by the developers of the tools.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Profundo Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Profundo Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article