Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of treatment effects from total arch distalization using modified C-palatal plates versus maxillary premolar extraction in Class II patients with severe overjet.
Alfawaz, Fawaz; Park, Jae Hyun; Lee, Nam-Ki; Bayome, Mohamed; Tai, Kiyoshi; Ku, Ja Hyeong; Kim, Yoonji; Kook, Yoon-Ah.
Afiliación
  • Alfawaz F; Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park JH; Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, US.
  • Lee NK; International Scholar, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Bayome M; Department of Orthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • Tai K; Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Alhufuf, Saudi Arabia.
  • Ku JH; Department of Postgraduate Studies, Universidad Autonóma del Paraguay, Asunción, Paraguay.
  • Kim Y; Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, Mesa, AZ, US.
  • Kook YA; Private practice of orthodontics, Okayama, Japan.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 25(1): 119-127, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34087028
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This study aimed to compare the skeletodental and soft tissue changes with total arch distalization using a modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) and maxillary first premolar extraction treatment in Class II malocclusion patients with severe overjet. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION The sample consisted of 46 adult patients who had Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overjet; 25 of them received non-extraction treatment with MCPPs (age, 22.5 ± 7.2 years), and 21 received maxillary first premolar extraction treatment (age 23.4 ± 6.5 years).

METHOD:

A total of 26 variables were measured on pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms. To evaluate the differences between pretreatment and post-treatment in each group, t tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used. To compare the amount of change between the two groups, MANOVA test was used.

RESULTS:

The overjet was significantly reduced in the MCPP and extraction groups by 4.8 mm and 5.4 mm, respectively. However, the two groups had no significant difference in the sagittal, vertical and angular changes of the maxillary incisors. In addition, regarding soft tissue changes, the MCPP and extraction groups showed an increased nasolabial angle of 7.5° and 9.4°, decreased upper lip to the true vertical line of 1.8 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no significant difference in the skeletal changes between the MCPP and extraction groups, and the reduction in overjet was similar in the groups. These results suggest that MCPP might be a viable treatment option for total arch distalization in Class II malocclusion patients with severe overjet.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sobremordida / Maloclusión Clase II de Angle Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sobremordida / Maloclusión Clase II de Angle Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article