Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early implant placement with or without alveolar ridge preservation in single tooth gaps renders similar esthetic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures: One-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Jonker, Brend P; Strauss, Franz J; Naenni, Nadja; Jung, Ronald E; Wolvius, Eppo B; Pijpe, Justin.
Afiliación
  • Jonker BP; Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Strauss FJ; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Naenni N; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Jung RE; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Wolvius EB; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Pijpe J; Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 32(9): 1041-1051, 2021 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129708
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To test whether early implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) results in different esthetic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with early implant placement without ARP. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Seventy-five patients requiring single tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla were recruited. Following tooth extraction, the patients were randomly allocated to three groups (a) ARP using demineralized bovine bone mineral containing 10% collagen (DBBM-C) covered by a collagen matrix (CM) (n = 25), (b) ARP using DBBM-C covered with a palatal graft (PG) (n = 25) and (c) spontaneous healing (control) (n = 25). Eight weeks after tooth extraction, a CBCT was taken and early implant placement was performed in all patients. Esthetic, clinical and PROMs were evaluated one year post-loading.

RESULTS:

A total of 70 patients were available for re-examination at one year post-loading. The median mid-facial mucosal margin change amounted to -0.02 mm (IQR -0.27-0.46) in the CM group, -0.13 mm (IQR -0.44-0.25) in the PG group and -0.14 mm (IQR -0.29-0.07) in the control group, with no significant differences between the groups. Mean PES scores amounted to 7.0 ± 1.4 in the CM group, 7.1 ± 1.5 in the PG group and 7.3 ± 1.7 in the control group without significant differences between the groups. Plaque, bleeding on probing and probing depth did not differ between treatment groups. PROMs in general revealed no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION:

Early implant placement with ARP using either a collagen matrix or a palatal graft rendered similar esthetic, clinical and PROMs to early implant placement without ARP. When a failing tooth can be replaced with an implant within 2 months after tooth extraction, the added value of ARP might be clinically negligible.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article