Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in bone mineral density in Down syndrome individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang, Y; Tian, Z; Ye, S; Mu, Q; Wang, X; Ren, S; Hou, X; Yu, W; Guo, J.
Afiliación
  • Zhang Y; Department of Pediatric, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
  • Tian Z; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
  • Ye S; Department of Pediatric, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
  • Mu Q; Department of Central Laboratory & Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
  • Wang X; Department of Central Laboratory & Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
  • Ren S; Department of Pediatric, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
  • Hou X; Department of Pediatric, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
  • Yu W; Department of Central Laboratory & Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China. weidongyu@bjmu.edu.cn.
  • Guo J; Department of Pediatric, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China. jingzhu.guo@bjmu.edu.cn.
Osteoporos Int ; 33(1): 27-37, 2022 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383099
ABSTRACT
Data evaluating changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in Down syndrome (DS) individuals remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand associations between BMD and DS. A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up until 1st January 2021 was conducted. We used the keywords "bone mineral density" and "Down Syndrome." Fifteen studies were included. Overall, our results showed a significant decrease in BMD of total body (TB BMD) [MD = - 0.18; 95% CI (- 0.23 and - 0.12), P < 0.00001, I2 = 89%], total hip (TH BMD) [MD = - 0.12; 95% CI (- 0.15 and - 0.10), P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%], lumbar spine (LS BMD) [MD = - 0.12; 95% CI (- 0.14 and - 0.09), P < 0.00001, I2 = 18%], and femoral neck (FN BMD) [MD = - 0.08; 95% CI (- 0.10 and - 0.06), P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%] in DS individuals when compared with controls. Moreover, the volumetric BMD of lumbar spine (LS vBMD) [MD = - 0.01; 95% CI (- 0.02 and - 0.01), P = 0.0004, I2 = 19%] also showed a decreasing tendency while the volumetric BMD of the femoral neck (FN vBMD) [MD = 0.01; 95% CI (0.00 and 0.02), P = 0.02, I2 = 0%] was elevated in DS individuals versus controls. These findings demonstrated that individuals with DS had a decreased total and regional (TH, LS, and FN) BMD when compared with the general population. Additionally, when BMD was adjusted for skeletal volume, LS vBMD was also lower, while FN vBMD was elevated in DS individuals versus controls.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Densidad Ósea / Síndrome de Down Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Densidad Ósea / Síndrome de Down Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article