Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experience of Treating COVID-19 With Remdesivir and Convalescent Plasma in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study.
Koirala, Janak; Gyanwali, Pradip; Gerzoff, Robert B; Bhattarai, Saroj; Nepal, Bipin; Manandhar, Rekha; Jha, Runa; Sharma, Sanjib; Sharma, Yuba Raj; Bastola, Anup; Murphy, Holly; Acharya, Subhash; Adhikari, Prabhat; Rajkarnikari, Manita; Vaidya, Karishma M; Panthi, Chhabi L; Bista, Bihungum; Giri, Grishma; Aryal, Shambhu; Pant, Suman; Pokharel, Akritee; Karki, Shristi; Basnet, Sangita; Koirala, Bhagawan; Dhimal, Meghnath.
Afiliación
  • Koirala J; Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Gyanwali P; Division of Infectious Diseases, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA.
  • Gerzoff RB; Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Bhattarai S; Applied Statistical Consulting LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Nepal B; Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Manandhar R; Grande International Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Jha R; National Public Health Laboratory, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Sharma S; National Public Health Laboratory, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Sharma YR; Department of Internal Medicine, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
  • Bastola A; Department of Internal Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.
  • Murphy H; Sukraraj Tropical and Communicable Disease Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Acharya S; Saint Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Adhikari P; Department of Internal Medicine, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Rajkarnikari M; Grande International Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Vaidya KM; Nepal Red Cross, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Panthi CL; National Public Health Laboratory, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Bista B; Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Giri G; Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Aryal S; Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Pant S; Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, Virginia, USA.
  • Pokharel A; Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Karki S; Department of Drug Administration, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Basnet S; Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Koirala B; Division of Infectious Diseases, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA.
  • Dhimal M; Department of Internal Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(8): ofab391, 2021 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34430672
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) and remdesivir (REM) have been approved for investigational use to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Nepal.

METHODS:

In this prospective, multicentered study, we evaluated the safety and outcomes of treatment with CPT and/or REM in 1315 hospitalized COVID-19 patients over 18 years in 31 hospitals across Nepal. REM was administered to patients with moderate, severe, or life-threatening infection. CPT was administered to patients with severe to life-threatening infections who were at high risk for progression or clinical worsening despite REM. Clinical findings and outcomes were recorded until discharge or death.

RESULTS:

Patients were classified as having moderate (24.2%), severe (64%), or life-threatening (11.7%) COVID-19 infection. The majority of CPT and CPT + REM recipients had severe to life-threatening infections (CPT 98.3%; CPT + REM 92.1%) and were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU; CPT 91.8%; CPT + REM 94.6%) compared with those who received REM alone (73.3% and 57.5%, respectively). Of 1083 patients with reported outcomes, 78.4% were discharged and 21.6% died. The discharge rate was 84% for REM (n = 910), 39% for CPT (n = 59), and 54.4% for CPT + REM (n = 114) recipients. In a logistic model comparing death vs discharge and adjusted for age, gender, steroid use, and severity, the predicted margin for discharge was higher for recipients of remdesivir alone (0.82; 95% CI, 0.79-0.84) compared with CPT (0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.70) and CPT + REM (0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74) recipients. Adverse events of remdesivir and CPT were reported in <5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates a safe rollout of CPT and REM in a resource-limited setting. Remdesivir recipients had less severe infection and better outcomes.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier. NCT04570982.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article