Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT for the Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
Nous, Fay M A; Geisler, Tobias; Kruk, Mariusz B P; Alkadhi, Hatem; Kitagawa, Kakuya; Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn; Hell, Michaela M; Hausleiter, Jörg; Nguyen, Patricia K; Budde, Ricardo P J; Nikolaou, Konstantin; Kepka, Cezary; Manka, Robert; Sakuma, Hajime; Malik, Sachin B; Coenen, Adriaan; Zijlstra, Felix; Klotz, Ernst; van der Harst, Pim; Artzner, Christoph; Dedic, Admir; Pugliese, Francesca; Bamberg, Fabian; Nieman, Koen.
Afiliación
  • Nous FMA; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Geisler T; Department of Cardiology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Kruk MBP; Coronary Disease and Structural Heart Diseases Department, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Alkadhi H; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kitagawa K; Department of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
  • Vliegenthart R; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Hell MM; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Hausleiter J; Department of Cardiology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
  • Nguyen PK; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Cardiology Section, Palo Alto, California, USA; Stanford University, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford, California, USA; Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Budde RPJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Nikolaou K; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Kepka C; Coronary Disease and Structural Heart Diseases Department, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Manka R; Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Sakuma H; Department of Radiology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
  • Malik SB; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Palo Alto, California, USA; Stanford University, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging (Affiliated), Stanford, California, USA.
  • Coenen A; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Zijlstra F; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Klotz E; Siemens Healthineers, Forcheim, Germany.
  • van der Harst P; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Artzner C; Department of Cardiology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Dedic A; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Pugliese F; Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health National Health Service Trust,
  • Bamberg F; Department of Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Nieman K; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Stanford University School o
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 15(1): 75-87, 2022 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34538630
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

In this international, multicenter study, using third-generation dual-source computed tomography (CT), we investigated the diagnostic performance of dynamic stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) in addition to coronary CT angiography (CTA) compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).

BACKGROUND:

CT-MPI combined with coronary CTA integrates coronary artery anatomy with inducible myocardial ischemia, showing promising results for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease in single-center studies.

METHODS:

At 9 centers in Europe, Japan, and the United States, 132 patients scheduled for ICA were enrolled; 114 patients successfully completed coronary CTA, adenosine-stress dynamic CT-MPI, and ICA. Invasive FFR was performed in vessels with 25% to 90% stenosis. Data were analyzed by independent core laboratories. For the primary analysis, for each coronary artery the presence of hemodynamically significant obstruction was interpreted by coronary CTA with CT-MPI compared to coronary CTA alone, using an FFR of ≤0.80 and angiographic severity as reference. Territorial absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and relative MBF were compared using C-statistics.

RESULTS:

ICA and FFR identified hemodynamically significant stenoses in 74 of 289 coronary vessels (26%). Coronary CTA with ≥50% stenosis demonstrated a per-vessel sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the detection of hemodynamically significant stenosis of 96% (95% CI 91%-100%), 72% (95% CI 66%-78%), and 78% (95% CI 73%-83%), respectively. Coronary CTA with CT-MPI showed a lower sensitivity (84%; 95% CI 75%-92%) but higher specificity (89%; 95% CI 85%-93%) and accuracy (88%; 95% CI 84%-92%). The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of absolute MBF and relative MBF were 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.86) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.88), respectively. The median dose-length product of CT-MPI and coronary CTA were 313 mGy·cm and 138 mGy·cm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Dynamic CT-MPI offers incremental diagnostic value over coronary CTA alone for the identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Generalized results from this multicenter study encourage broader consideration of dynamic CT-MPI in clinical practice. (Dynamic Stress Perfusion CT for Detection of Inducible Myocardial Ischemia [SPECIFIC]; NCT02810795).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Estenosis Coronaria / Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico / Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Estenosis Coronaria / Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico / Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article