Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation dose of fluoroscopy-guided versus ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spine epidural steroid injections.
Wieschhoff, Ged G; Miskin, Nityanand P; Kim, Jeom Soon; Hamberg, Leena M; Mandell, Jacob C.
Afiliación
  • Wieschhoff GG; Departments of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. gwieschhoff@bwh.harvard.edu.
  • Miskin NP; Departments of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Kim JS; Departments of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Hamberg LM; Departments of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Mandell JC; Departments of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Skeletal Radiol ; 51(5): 1055-1062, 2022 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34611727
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Compare radiation dose of lumbar spine epidural steroid injections (ESIs) performed under fluoroscopy guidance and ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy guidance. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Retrospective review of consecutive lumbar ESIs performed using fluoroscopy, between May 2017 and April 2019, and using ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy, between August 2019 and February 2021, was performed. Ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy technique omits a planning CT scan, utilizes CT-fluoroscopy, and minimizes radiation dose parameters. Patient characteristics (age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI)), procedural characteristics (anatomic level, type of ESI, procedure time, pain reduction, complications, trainee participation), and radiation dose were compared. Chi-square tests and two-sample t-tests were performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS:

One hundred and forty-seven patients (mean age 55.8 ± 16.7; 85 women) underwent ESIs using fluoroscopy. Sixty-six patients (mean age 60.9 ± 16.7; 33 women) underwent ESIs using ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy. The effective dose for the fluoroscopy group was 0.30 mSv ± 0.34, compared to 0.15 mSV ± 0.11 for ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy (p < 0.001). The average age in the CT-fluoroscopy group was older (p = 0.04), and there was more trainee participation in the fluoroscopy group (p < 0.001); otherwise there was no statistically significant difference in patient or procedural characteristics between the conventional fluoroscopy group and the ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy group. There was no statistically significant difference in immediate post-procedure pain reduction between the groups (p = 0.16). Four intrathecal injections occurred only in the fluoroscopy group, though this difference was not significant (p = 0.18).

CONCLUSION:

Ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy technique for image-guided lumbar spine ESIs can lower radiation dose compared to fluoroscopy-guided technique.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Radiografía Intervencional Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Radiografía Intervencional Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article