Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Face-to-Face Instruction and Personalized Regimens Improve the Quality of Inpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.
Gao, Hui; Liu, Cenqin; Yuan, Xin; Lu, Hongpeng; Xia, Yonghong; Zhang, Zhixin; Bao, Zhenfei; Wang, Weihong; Xie, Jiarong; Xu, Lei.
Afiliación
  • Gao H; School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, Zhejiang, China.
  • Liu C; Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, Zhejiang, China.
  • Yuan X; Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, Zhejiang, China.
  • Lu H; College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
  • Xia Y; School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, Zhejiang, China.
  • Zhang Z; Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, Zhejiang, China.
  • Bao Z; Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, Zhejiang, China.
  • Wang W; Department of Gastroenterology, Ninghai Second Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.
  • Xie J; Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, Zhejiang, China.
  • Xu L; Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, Zhejiang, China.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(8): 3592-3600, 2022 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705157
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Poor bowel preparation is commonly observed in inpatients undergoing colonoscopy, particularly those with higher risks for inadequate bowel preparation.

AIMS:

The objective of this study was to determine whether personalized bowel preparation regimens combined with face-to-face instruction (FFI) could improve the quality of bowel preparation for inpatient.

METHODS:

In this endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 320 inpatients were enrolled and randomly allocated (11) to the control and intervention groups. The intervention group received FFI and personalized bowel preparation regimens, while the control group received the routine bowel preparation regimen and education. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of procedure-related adverse events, incorrect diet restriction and laxative intake, etc.

RESULTS:

The adequate bowel preparation rate in the intervention group was significantly higher compared to control group [intention-to-treat (ITT)

analysis:

70.0% vs 51.3%, P < 0.001; per-protocol (PP)

analysis:

79.4% vs 58.6%, P < 0.001]. Bowel cleanliness was significantly improved in high-risk inpatients (ITT

analysis:

65% vs 44.6%, P = 0.004; PP

analysis:

73.0% vs 51.7%, P = 0.004) and in low-risk inpatients (ITT

analysis:

80% vs 62.7%, P = 0.037; PP

analysis:

92.3% vs 69.8%, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences between two groups regarding procedure-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS:

Personalized bowel preparation regimens combined with FFI improve the rate of adequate bowel preparation, especially for patients with high-risk factors. As such, inpatients could benefit from this novel approach for better bowel preparation to ultimately improve the quality of colonoscopies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colonoscopía / Pacientes Internos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colonoscopía / Pacientes Internos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article