Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Goldberg, Rebecca M; Kim, Soyoun Rachel; Fazelzad, Rouhi; Li, Xuan; Brown, Theodore J; May, Taymaa.
Afiliación
  • Goldberg RM; Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kim SR; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Fazelzad R; Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Li X; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Biostatistics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Brown TJ; Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • May T; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: taymaa.may@uhn.ca.
Gynecol Oncol ; 164(1): 212-220, 2022 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756470
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) is a relatively chemo-resistant disease with limited effective treatment options for patients with recurrence. Secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) is commonly offered at recurrence, although any benefit this has on survival is not fully determined. This review evaluates the impact of SCS, including residual disease, on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in recurrent LGSC.

METHODS:

A comprehensive search of Medline ALL, Embase Classic + Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science was conducted to obtain studies evaluating optimal or complete SCS versus suboptimal SCS and the amount of residual disease in recurrent LGSC. Meta-analysis was performed and PFS and OS outcomes were calculated.

RESULTS:

1Of 5296 studies screened, 350 progressed to full-text review, with 9 ultimately selected for inclusion in the systematic review. Two studies met criteria for meta-analysis of PFS and of OS. The presence of visible residual disease at the conclusion of SCS negatively impacted PFS (HR = 3.51, 95% CI = 1.72-7.14), whereas SCS with no residual disease significantly improved OS (HR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.23-0.7) in patients with recurrent LGSC. Diffuse and extensive disease distribution was inversely linked to survival. In addition, SCS as an initial treatment for recurrent LGSC was associated with superior survival in comparison to chemotherapy. A short platinum-free interval was not associated with worse survival in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS:

Complete SCS, and to a lesser extent optimal SCS, are associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with recurrent LGSC. SCS may be a better initial treatment strategy than systemic chemotherapy for recurrent disease. Patients with recurrent LGSC should be evaluated for the role of SCS based on disease distribution and functional status, irrespective of the platinum-free interval. Prospective studies are needed to further study the role of SCS in patients with recurrent LGSC.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article