Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
TMS intensity and focality correlation with coil orientation at three non-motor regions.
Gomez-Feria, Jose; Fernandez-Corazza, Mariano; Martin-Rodriguez, Juan F; Mir, Pablo.
Afiliación
  • Gomez-Feria J; Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología y Neurofisiología Clínica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
  • Fernandez-Corazza M; Centro de Investigacion Biomedica sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain.
  • Martin-Rodriguez JF; LEICI-Instituto de Investigaciones en Electrónica, Control y Procesamiento de Señales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), CONICET, La Plata, Argentina.
  • Mir P; Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología y Neurofisiología Clínica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Phys Med Biol ; 67(5)2022 02 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081513
ABSTRACT
Objective. The aim of this study is to define the best coil orientations for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for three clinically relevant brain areas pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC), by means of simulations in 12 realistic head models of the electric field (E-field).Methods. We computed the E-field generated by TMS in our three volumes of interest (VOI) that were delineated based on published atlases. We then analysed the maximum intensity and spatial focality for the normal and absolute components of the E-field considering different percentile thresholds. Lastly, we correlated these results with the different anatomical properties of our VOIs.Results. Overall, the spatial focality of the E-field for the three VOIs varied depending on the orientation of the coil. Further analysis showed that differences in individual brain anatomy were related to the amount of focality achieved. In general, a larger percentage of sulcus resulted in better spatial focality. Additionally, a higher normal E-field intensity was achieved when the coil axis was placed perpendicular to the predominant orientations of the gyri of each VOI. A positive correlation between spatial focality and E-field intensity was found for PPC and IFG but not for pre-SMA.Conclusions. For a rough approximation, better coil orientations can be based on the individual's specific brain morphology at the VOI. Moreover, TMS computational models should be employed to obtain better coil orientations in non-motor regions of interest.Significance. Finding better coil orientations in non-motor regions is a challenge in TMS and seeks to reduce interindividual variability. Our individualized TMS simulation pipeline leads to fewer inter-individual variability in the focality, likely enhancing the efficacy of the stimulation and reducing the risk of stimulating adjacent, non-targeted areas.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal / Corteza Motora Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal / Corteza Motora Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article