Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficiently identifying individuals at high risk for treatment resistance in major depressive disorder using electronic health records.
Lage, Isaac; McCoy, Thomas H; Perlis, Roy H; Doshi-Velez, Finale.
Afiliación
  • Lage I; Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 29 Oxford Street, 1 Oxford St, Science Center, 316.04, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
  • McCoy TH; Center for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Perlis RH; Center for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: rperlis@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Doshi-Velez F; Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 29 Oxford Street, 1 Oxford St, Science Center, 316.04, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: finale@seas.harvard.edu.
J Affect Disord ; 306: 254-259, 2022 06 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35181388
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

With the emergence of evidence-based treatments for treatment-resistant depression, strategies to identify individuals at greater risk for treatment resistance early in the course of illness could have clinical utility. We sought to develop and validate a model to predict treatment resistance in major depressive disorder using coded clinical data from the electronic health record.

METHODS:

We identified individuals from a large health system with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder receiving an index antidepressant prescription, and used a tree-based machine learning classifier to build a risk stratification model to identify those likely to experience treatment resistance. The resulting model was validated in a second health system.

RESULTS:

In the second health system, the extra trees model yielded an AUC of 0.652 (95% CI 0.623-0.682); with sensitivity constrained at 0.80, specificity was 0.358 (95% CI 0.300-0.413). Lift in the top quintile was 1.99 (95% CI 1.76-2.22). Including additional data for the 4 weeks following treatment initiation did not meaningfully improve model performance.

LIMITATIONS:

The extent to which these models generalize across additional health systems will require further investigation.

CONCLUSION:

Electronic health records facilitated stratification of risk for treatment-resistant depression and demonstrated generalizability to a second health system. Efforts to improve upon such models using additional measures, and to understand their performance in real-world clinical settings, are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastorno Depresivo Mayor / Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastorno Depresivo Mayor / Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article