Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Toward the Personalization of Biceps Fatigue Detection Model for Gym Activity: An Approach to Utilize Wearables' Data from the Crowd.
Elshafei, Mohamed; Costa, Diego Elias; Shihab, Emad.
Afiliación
  • Elshafei M; Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada.
  • Costa DE; Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada.
  • Shihab E; Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada.
Sensors (Basel) ; 22(4)2022 Feb 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35214356
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, wearables-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems represent a modern, robust, and lightweight solution to monitor athlete performance. However, user data variability is a problem that may hinder the performance of HAR systems, especially the cross-subject HAR models. Such a problem may have a lesser effect on the subject-specific model because it is a tailored model that serves a specific user; hence, data variability is usually low, and performance is often high. However, such a performance comes with a high cost in data collection and processing per user. Therefore, in this work, we present a personalized model that achieves higher performance than the cross-subject model while maintaining a lower data cost than the subject-specific model. Our personalization approach sources data from the crowd based on similarity scores computed between the test subject and the individuals in the crowd. Our dataset consists of 3750 concentration curl repetitions from 25 volunteers with ages and BMI ranging between 20-46 and 24-46, respectively. We compute 11 hand-crafted features and train 2 personalized AdaBoost models, Decision Tree (AdaBoost-DT) and Artificial Neural Networks (AdaBoost-ANN), using data from whom the test subject shares similar physical and single traits. Our findings show that the AdaBoost-DT model outperforms the cross-subject-DT model by 5.89%, while the AdaBoost-ANN model outperforms the cross-subject-ANN model by 3.38%. On the other hand, at 50.0% less of the test subject's data consumption, our AdaBoost-DT model outperforms the subject-specific-DT model by 16%, while the AdaBoost-ANN model outperforms the subject-specific-ANN model by 10.33%. Yet, the subject-specific models achieve the best performances at 100% of the test subjects' data consumption.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Brazo / Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Brazo / Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article