Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emergent microsurgical intervention for acute stroke after mechanical thrombectomy failure: a prospective study.
Fiedler, Jirí; Roubec, Martin; Grubhoffer, Marek; Ostrý, Svatopluk; Procházka, Václav; Langová, Katerina; Skoloudík, David.
Afiliación
  • Fiedler J; Department of Neurosurgery, Nemocnice Ceské Budejovice, Ceské Budejovice, Jihoceský, Czech Republic.
  • Roubec M; Department of Neurosurgery, Univerzita Karlova Lékarská fakulta v Plzni, Plzen, Plzenský, Czech Republic.
  • Grubhoffer M; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Moravskoslezský, Czech Republic.
  • Ostrý S; Center for Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Moravskoslezský, Czech Republic.
  • Procházka V; Department of Neurosurgery, Nemocnice Ceské Budejovice, Ceské Budejovice, Jihoceský, Czech Republic.
  • Langová K; Department of Neurosurgery, Univerzita Karlova Lékarská fakulta v Plzni, Plzen, Plzenský, Czech Republic.
  • Skoloudík D; Department of Neurology, Nemocnice Ceské Budejovice, Ceské Budejovice, Jihoceský, Czech Republic.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 15(5): 439-445, 2023 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35428739
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite all the gains that have been achieved with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy revascularization and intravenous thrombolysis logistics since 2015, there is still a subgroup of patients with salvageable brain tissue for whom persistent emergent large vessel occlusion portends a catastrophic outcome.

OBJECTIVE:

To test the safety and efficacy of emergent microsurgical intervention in patients with acute ischemic stroke and symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion after failure of mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS:

A prospective two-center cohort study was conducted. Patients with acute ischemic stroke and middle cerebral artery occlusion for whom recanalization failed at center 1 were randomly allocated to the microsurgical intervention group (MSIG) or control group 1 (CG1). All similar patients at center 2 were included in the control group 2 (CG2) with no surgical intervention. Microsurgical embolectomy and/or extracranial-intracranial bypass was performed in all MSIG patients at center 1.

RESULTS:

A total of 47 patients were enrolled in the study 22 at center 1 (12 allocated to the MSIG and 10 to the CG1) and 25 patients at center 2 (CG2). MSIG group patients showed a better clinical outcome on day 90 after the stroke, where a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 was reached in 7 (58.3%) of 12 patients compared with 1/10 (10.0%) patients in the CG1 and 3/12 (12.0%) in the CG2.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrated the potential for existing microsurgical techniques to provide good outcomes in 58% of microsurgically treated patients as a third-tier option.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Isquemia Encefálica / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Procedimientos Endovasculares / Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Isquemia Encefálica / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Procedimientos Endovasculares / Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article