Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Qualitative Analysis of the Host-Perceived Impact of Unidirectional Global Surgery Training in Kijabe, Kenya: Benefits, Challenges, and a Desire for Bidirectional Exchange.
Zivanov, Catherine N; Joseph, James; Pereira, Daniel E; MacLeod, Jana B A; Kauffmann, Rondi M.
Afiliación
  • Zivanov CN; Eskind Family Biomedical Library and Learning Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2209 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
  • Joseph J; Department of Surgery, Africa Inland Church Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, Kenya.
  • Pereira DE; Eskind Family Biomedical Library and Learning Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2209 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
  • MacLeod JBA; Department of Surgery, Africa Inland Church Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, Kenya.
  • Kauffmann RM; Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Kenyatta University School of Medicine, Nairobi, Kenya.
World J Surg ; 46(11): 2570-2584, 2022 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35976431
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

As globalization of surgical training increases, growing evidence demonstrates a positive impact of global surgery experiences on trainees from high-income countries (HIC). However, few studies have assessed the impact of these largely unidirectional experiences from the perspectives of host surgical personnel from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study aimed to assess the impact of unidirectional visitor involvement from the perspectives of host surgical personnel in Kijabe, Kenya.

METHODS:

Voluntary semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 host surgical personnel at a tertiary referral hospital in Kijabe, Kenya. Qualitative analysis was used to identify salient and recurring themes related to host experiences with visiting surgical personnel. Perceived benefits and challenges of HIC involvement and host interest in bidirectional exchange were assessed.

RESULTS:

Benefits of visitor involvement included positive learning experiences (95.3%), capacity building (83.7%), exposure to diverse practices and perspectives (74.4%), improved work ethic (51.2%), shared workload (44.2%), access to resources (41.9%), visitor contributions to patient care (41.9%), and mentorship opportunities (37.2%). Challenges included short stays (86.0%), visitor adaptation and integration (83.7%), cultural differences (67.4%), visitors with problematic behaviors (53.5%), learner saturation (34.9%), language barriers (32.6%), and perceived power imbalances between HIC and LMIC personnel (27.9%). Nearly half of host participants expressed concerns about the lack of balanced exchange between HIC and LMIC programs (48.8%). Almost all (96.9%) host trainees expressed interest in a bidirectional exchange program.

CONCLUSION:

As the field of global surgery continues to evolve, further assessment and representation of host perspectives is necessary to identify and address challenges and promote equitable, mutually beneficial partnerships between surgical programs in HIC and LMIC.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Organizaciones / Internacionalidad Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Organizaciones / Internacionalidad Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article