Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Elmer, Nicholas A; Baltodano, Pablo A; Webster, Theresa; Deng, Mengying; Egleston, Brian; Massada, Karen; Kaplunov, Briana; Brebion, Rohan; Araya, Sthefano; Patel, Sameer A.
Afiliación
  • Elmer NA; From the Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University.
  • Baltodano PA; Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
  • Webster T; Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
  • Deng M; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center.
  • Egleston B; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center.
  • Massada K; Mercy Catholic Medical Center Division of General Surgery, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Kaplunov B; Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
  • Brebion R; Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
  • Araya S; Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
  • Patel SA; Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Ann Plast Surg ; 89(3): 295-300, 2022 09 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35993684
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2019 database were analyzed to determine the rates of take-back. Timing and rates of unplanned head and neck free flap take-backs were stratified by tissue type and postoperative day (POD) over the first month. Weibull survival models were used to compare rates of take-backs among time intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of take-back.

RESULTS:

Three thousand nine hundred six head and neck free flaps were analyzed. The mean daily proportion of patients experiencing take-back during PODs 0 to 1 was 0.95%; this dropped significantly to a mean daily proportion of 0.54% during POD 2 (P < 0.01). In addition, there were significant drops in take-back when comparing POD 2 (0.54%) to POD 3 (0.26%) and also when comparing POD 4 (0.20%) with PODs 5 to 30 (0.032% per day) (P < 0.05). The soft tissue and osseous flap populations demonstrated a similar trend in unplanned take-back.

CONCLUSION:

This is the first national study to specifically analyze the timing of take-back in the head and neck reconstruction population. These data highlight the importance of flap monitoring during the first 5 PODs, with ERAS pathway optimization aiming for discharge by the end of the first postoperative week.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Colgajos Tisulares Libres / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Colgajos Tisulares Libres / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article