Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health equity guiding frameworks and indices in injury: A review of the literature.
Lennon, Natalie H; Carmichael, Andrea E; Qualters, Judith R.
Afiliación
  • Lennon NH; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Injury Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA; Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), Division of Injury Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Electronic address: nlennon@cdc.gov.
  • Carmichael AE; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Injury Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
  • Qualters JR; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Injury Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
J Safety Res ; 82: 469-481, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36031278
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In early 2021, CDC released the CORE Health Equity Strategy, which resolves to integrate a comprehensive health equity approach to the work of the Agency. One priority of the Injury Center's Division of Injury Prevention is to move health equity research in injury forward. The purpose of this research is to perform an initial exploration of health equity guiding frameworks and indices to better understand which of these has been applied to injury research topics.

METHODS:

A PubMed and CINAHL search of meta-analysis and systematic review articles was conducted from January 1998 through April 2022. Articles of any type and additional frameworks/indices were also identified from staff knowledge of the literature. Books were also considered, where accessible. The following areas were reviewed for each resource population addressed, guiding framework/index, other health equity variables, gaps identified, and whether the articles addressed an injury topic.

FINDINGS:

The PubMed/CINAHL search produced 230 articles, and an additional 29 articles and 8 books were added from previous knowledge of the literature, resulting in a total of 267 resources for review. There were 60 frameworks/indices compiled that were relevant to health equity. Out of all the resources, three reported on an injury topic and used the PROGRESS-Plus framework, the WHO Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework, and a social-ecological framework.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study found there were many frameworks/indices for measuring health equity; however, there were few injury-related meta-analysis and systematic review articles. Some frameworks/indices may be more appropriate than others for measuring health equity in injury topic areas, depending on which social determinants of health (SDOHs) they address. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Measuring health equity in injury and other public health research areas can help build a foundation of evidence. Moving forward, injury researchers can consider the frameworks/indices identified through this study in their health equity injury research.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Equidad en Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Equidad en Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article