Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of a clinical decision support system on paediatric drug dose prescribing: a randomised within-subject simulation trial.
Higi, Lukas; Schmitt, Raffael; Käser, Karin; Wälti, Monika; Grotzer, Michael; Vonbach, Priska.
Afiliación
  • Higi L; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland lukas.higi@unibas.ch.
  • Schmitt R; PEDeus AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Käser K; Department of Computational Linguistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Wälti M; PEDeus AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Grotzer M; PEDeus AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Vonbach P; PEDeus AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 7(1)2023 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36697035
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Drug dosing errors are among the most frequent causes of preventable harm in paediatrics. Due to the complexity of paediatric pharmacotherapy and the working conditions in healthcare, it is not surprising that human factor is a well-described source of error. Thus, a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that supports healthcare professionals (HCP) during the dose prescribing step provides a promising strategy for error prevention.

METHODS:

The aim of the trial was to simulate the dose derivation step during the prescribing process. HCPs were asked to derive dosages for 18 hypothetical patient cases. We compared the CDSS PEDeDose, which provides a built-in dose calculator to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) used together with a pocket calculator in a randomised within-subject trial. We assessed the number of dose calculation errors and the time needed for calculation. Additionally, the effect of PEDeDose without using the built-in calculator but with a pocket calculator instead was assessed.

RESULTS:

A total of 52 HCPs participated in the trial. The OR for an erroneous dosage using the CDSS as compared with the SmPC with pocket calculator was 0.08 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.36, p<0.001). Thus, the odds of an error were 12 times higher while using the SmPC. Furthermore, there was a 45% (95% CI 39% to 51%, p<0.001) time reduction when the dosage was derived using the CDSS. The exploratory analysis revealed that using only PEDeDose but without the built-in calculator did not substantially reduce errors.

CONCLUSION:

Our results provide robust evidence that the use of the CDSS is safer and more efficient than manual dose derivation in paediatrics. Interestingly, only consulting a dosing database was not sufficient to substantially reduce errors. We are confident the CDSS PEDeDose ensures a higher safety and speeds up the prescribing process in practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article