Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Meta-Analysis of Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia and Tumor Treating Fields in the Treatment of Glioblastomas.
Szasz, Attila Marcell; Arrojo Alvarez, Elisabeth Estefanía; Fiorentini, Giammaria; Herold, Magdolna; Herold, Zoltan; Sarti, Donatella; Dank, Magdolna.
Afiliación
  • Szasz AM; Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Arrojo Alvarez EE; Oncología Radioterápica, Servicios y Unidades Asistenciales, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
  • Fiorentini G; Medical Institute of Advanced Oncology, 28037 Madrid, Spain.
  • Herold M; Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera "Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord", 61121 Pesaro, Italy.
  • Herold Z; IHF Integrative Oncology Outpatient Clinic, 40121 Bologna, Italy.
  • Sarti D; Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Dank M; Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, 1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(3)2023 Jan 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36765840
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Glioblastoma is one of the most difficult to treat and most aggressive brain tumors, having a poor survival rate. The use of non-invasive modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) and Tumor Treating Fields (TTF) devices has been introduced in the last few decades, both of which having proven anti-tumor effects.

METHODS:

A meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies about mEHT and TTF was conducted.

RESULTS:

A total of seven and fourteen studies about mEHT and TTF were included, with a total number of 450 and 1309 cases, respectively. A 42% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 25-59%] 1-year survival rate was found for mEHT, which was raised to 61% (95% CI 32-89%) if only the studies conducted after 2008 were investigated. In the case of TTF, 1-year survival was 67% (95% CI 53-81%). Subgroup analyses revealed that newly diagnosed patients might get extra benefits from the early introduction of the devices (mEHT all studies 73% vs. 37%, p = 0.0021; mEHT studies after 2008 73% vs. 54%, p = 0.4214; TTF studies 83% vs. 52%, p = 0.0083), compared with recurrent glioblastoma.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our meta-analysis showed that both mEHT and TTF can improve glioblastoma survival, and the most benefit may be achieved in newly diagnosed cases.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article