Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical assessment of a novel machine-learning automated contouring tool for radiotherapy planning.
Hu, Yunfei; Nguyen, Huong; Smith, Claire; Chen, Tom; Byrne, Mikel; Archibald-Heeren, Ben; Rijken, James; Aland, Trent.
Afiliación
  • Hu Y; Icon Cancer Centre Concord, Rusty Priest Building, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Concord NSW, Australia.
  • Nguyen H; ICON Core Office, South Brisbane QLD, Australia.
  • Smith C; ICON Core Office, South Brisbane QLD, Australia.
  • Chen T; Icon Cancer Centre Springfield, Cancer Care Centre Mater Private Hospital, 30 Health Care Dr, Springfield, Queensland, Australia.
  • Byrne M; Icon Cancer Centre Wahroonga, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Archibald-Heeren B; Icon Cancer Centre Concord, Rusty Priest Building, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Concord NSW, Australia.
  • Rijken J; Icon Cancer Centre Windsor Gardens, Windsor Gardens, South Australia, Australia.
  • Aland T; ICON Core Office, South Brisbane QLD, Australia.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 24(7): e13949, 2023 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36871161
ABSTRACT
Contouring has become an increasingly important aspect of radiotherapy due to inverse planning. Several studies have suggested that the clinical implementation of automated contouring tools can reduce inter-observer variation while increasing contouring efficiency, thereby improving the quality of radiotherapy treatment and reducing the time between simulation and treatment. In this study, a novel, commercial automated contouring tool based on machine learning, the AI-Rad Companion Organs RT™ (AI-Rad) software (Version VA31) (Siemens Healthineers, Munich, Germany), was assessed against both manually delineated contours and another commercially available automated contouring software, Varian Smart Segmentation™ (SS) (Version 16.0) (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, United States). The quality of contours generated by AI-Rad in Head and Neck (H&N), Thorax, Breast, Male Pelvis (Pelvis_M), and Female Pelvis (Pevis_F) anatomical areas was evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively using several metrics. A timing analysis was subsequently performed to explore potential time savings achieved by AI-Rad. Results showed that most automated contours generated by AI-Rad were not only clinically acceptable and required minimal editing, but also superior in quality to contours generated by SS in multiple structures. In addition, timing analysis favored AI-Rad over manual contouring, indicating the largest time saving (753s per patient) in the Thorax area. AI-Rad was concluded to be a promising automated contouring solution that generated clinically acceptable contours and achieved time savings, thereby greatly benefiting the radiotherapy process.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article