Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bacteremia due to non-Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci and risk of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection.
Chesdachai, Supavit; Baddour, Larry M; Sohail, M Rizwan; Palraj, Bharath Raj; Madhavan, Malini; Tabaja, Hussam; Fida, Madiha; Lahr, Brian D; DeSimone, Daniel C.
Afiliación
  • Chesdachai S; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Baddour LM; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Sohail MR; Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Palraj BR; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Madhavan M; Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
  • Tabaja H; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Fida M; Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Lahr BD; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • DeSimone DC; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 4(3): 207-214, 2023 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36993918
ABSTRACT

Background:

Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection carries significant morbidity and mortality with bacteremia being a possible marker of device infection. A clinical profile of non-Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci (non-SA GPC) bacteremia in patients with CIED has been limited.

Objective:

To examine characteristics of patients with CIED who developed non-SA GPC bacteremia and risk of CIED infection.

Methods:

We reviewed all patients with CIED who developed non-SA GPC bacteremia at the Mayo Clinic between 2012 and 2019. The 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association Consensus Document was used to define CIED infection.

Results:

A total of 160 patients with CIED developed non-SA GPC bacteremia. CIED infection was present in 90 (56.3%) patients, in whom 60 (37.5%) were classified as definite and 30 (18.8%) as possible. This included 41 (45.6%) cases of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS), 30 (33.3%) cases of Enterococcus, 13 (14.4%) cases of viridans group streptococci (VGS), and 6 (6.7%) cases of other organisms. The adjusted odds of CIED infection in cases due to CoNS, Enterococcus, and VGS bacteremia were 19-, 14-, and 15-fold higher, respectively, as compared with other non-SA GPC. In patients with CIED infection, the reduction in risk of 1-year mortality associated with device removal was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.26-1.33; P = .198).

Conclusions:

The prevalence of CIED infection in non-SA GPC bacteremia was higher than previously reported, particularly in cases due to CoNS, Enterococcus species, and VGS. However, a larger cohort is needed to demonstrate the benefit of CIED extraction in patients with infected CIED due to non-SA GPC.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article