Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Targeted Genomic Profiling and Chemotherapy Outcomes in Grade 3 Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (G3 GEP-NET).
Lamberti, Giuseppe; Prinzi, Natalie; Bongiovanni, Alberto; Torniai, Mariangela; Andrini, Elisa; Biase, Dario de; Malvi, Deborah; Mosca, Mirta; Berardi, Rossana; Ibrahim, Toni; Pusceddu, Sara; Campana, Davide.
Afiliación
  • Lamberti G; Department of Medical or Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
  • Prinzi N; Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Orsola-Malpighi di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Bongiovanni A; Medical Oncology, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, 20133 Milano, Italy.
  • Torniai M; Osteoncology and Rare Tumor Center (CDO-TR), IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
  • Andrini E; Department of Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche-AOU delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
  • Biase D; Department of Medical or Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
  • Malvi D; Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
  • Mosca M; Solid Tumor Molecular Pathology Laboratory, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Berardi R; Pathology Unit, IRCCS Azienda-Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Ibrahim T; Department of Medical or Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
  • Pusceddu S; Department of Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche-AOU delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
  • Campana D; Osteoncology and Rare Tumor Center (CDO-TR), IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(9)2023 Apr 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37174986
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Grade 3 gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G3 GEP-NET) are poorly characterized in terms of molecular features and response to treatments.

METHODS:

Patients with G3 GEP-NET were included if they received capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) or oxaliplatin with either 5-fluorouracile (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (XELOX) as first-line treatment (chemotherapy cohort). G3 NET which successfully undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS) were included in the NGS cohort.

RESULTS:

In total, 49 patients were included in the chemotherapy cohort 15 received CAPTEM and 34 received FOLFOX/XELOX. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 42.9%, 9.0 months, and 33.6 months, respectively. Calculating a Ki67 cutoff using ROC curve analysis, tumors with Ki67 ≥ 40% had lower ORR (51.2% vs. 0%; p = 0.007) and shorter PFS (10.6 months vs. 4.4 months; p < 0.001) and OS (49.4 months vs. 10.0 months; p = 0.023). In patients who received FOLFOX/XELOX as a first-line treatment, ORR, PFS, and OS were 38.2%, 7.9 months, and 30.0 months, respectively. In the NGS cohort (N = 13), the most mutated genes were DAXX/ATRX (N = 5, 38%), MEN1 (N = 4, 31%), TP53 (N = 4, 31%), AKT1 (N = 2, 15%), and PIK3CA (N = 1, 8%).

CONCLUSIONS:

FOLFOX/XELOX chemotherapy is active as the first-line treatment of patients with G3 GEP-NET. The mutational landscape of G3 NET is more similar to well-differentiated NETs than NECs.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article