Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pathologic Lymph Node Regression After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Recurrence and Survival in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study in the United Kingdom.
Moore, Jonathan L; Green, Michael; Santaolalla, Aida; Deere, Harriet; Evans, Richard P T; Elshafie, Mona; Lavery, Anita; McManus, Damian T; McGuigan, Andrew; Douglas, Rosalie; Horne, Joanne; Walker, Robert; Mir, Hira; Terlizzo, Monica; Kamarajah, Sivesh K; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke; Maisey, Nick; Sita-Lumsden, Ailsa; Ngan, Sarah; Kelly, Mark; Baker, Cara R; Kumar, Sacheen; Lagergren, Jesper; Allum, William H; Gossage, James A; Griffiths, Ewen A; Grabsch, Heike I; Turkington, Richard C; Underwood, Tim J; Smyth, Elizabeth C; Fitzgerald, Rebecca C; Cunningham, David; Davies, Andrew R.
Afiliación
  • Moore JL; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Green M; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
  • Santaolalla A; Department of Histopathology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Deere H; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
  • Evans RPT; Department of Histopathology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Elshafie M; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Lavery A; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • McManus DT; Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • McGuigan A; Department of Pathology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • Douglas R; Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • Horne J; Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • Walker R; Department of Histopathology, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Mir H; School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Terlizzo M; Department of Histopathology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kamarajah SK; Department of Histopathology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Van Hemelrijck M; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Maisey N; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
  • Sita-Lumsden A; Department of Medical Oncology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Ngan S; Department of Medical Oncology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kelly M; Department of Medical Oncology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Baker CR; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kumar S; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
  • Lagergren J; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Allum WH; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
  • Gossage JA; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Griffiths EA; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Grabsch HI; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
  • Turkington RC; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Underwood TJ; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Smyth EC; Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Fitzgerald RC; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
  • Cunningham D; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Davies AR; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(28): 4522-4534, 2023 10 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37499209
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

There is limited evidence regarding the prognostic effects of pathologic lymph node (LN) regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma, and a definition of LN response is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate how LN regression influences survival after surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS:

Multicenter cohort study of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection at five high-volume centers in the United Kingdom. LNs retrieved at esophagectomy were examined for chemotherapy response and given a LN regression score (LNRS)-LNRS 1, complete response; 2, <10% residual tumor; 3, 10%-50% residual tumor; 4, >50% residual tumor; and 5, no response. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression adjusting for confounders including primary tumor regression. The discriminatory ability of different LN response classifications to predict survival was evaluated using Akaike information criterion and Harrell C-index.

RESULTS:

In total, 17,930 LNs from 763 patients were examined. LN response classified as complete LN response (LNRS 1 ≥1 LN, no residual tumor in any LN; n = 62, 8.1%), partial LN response (LNRS 1-3 ≥1 LN, residual tumor ≥1 LN; n = 155, 20.3%), poor/no LN response (LNRS 4-5; n = 303, 39.7%), or LN negative (no tumor/regression; n = 243, 31.8%) demonstrated superior discriminatory ability. Mortality was reduced in patients with complete LN response (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.56), partial LN response (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.93) or negative LNs (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.42) compared with those with poor/no LN response. Primary tumor regression and LN regression were discordant in 165 patients (21.9%).

CONCLUSION:

Pathologic LN regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was a strong prognostic factor and provides important information beyond pathologic TNM staging and primary tumor regression grading. LN regression should be included as standard in the pathologic reporting of esophagectomy specimens.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Ganglios Linfáticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Ganglios Linfáticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article