Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
United States Regulatory Approval of Topical Treatments for Dry Eye.
Cui, David; Saldanha, Ian J; Li, Gavin; Mathews, Priya M; Lin, Michael X; Akpek, Esen K.
Afiliación
  • Cui D; From the Ocular Surface Disease Clinic, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (D.C., G.L., P.M.M., M.X.L., E.K.A.), Baltimore, Maryland; The Krieger Eye Institute, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore (D.C.), Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Saldanha IJ; Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (I.J.S.), Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Li G; From the Ocular Surface Disease Clinic, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (D.C., G.L., P.M.M., M.X.L., E.K.A.), Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Mathews PM; From the Ocular Surface Disease Clinic, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (D.C., G.L., P.M.M., M.X.L., E.K.A.), Baltimore, Maryland; Center For Sight (P.M.M.), Sarasota, Florida, USA.
  • Lin MX; From the Ocular Surface Disease Clinic, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (D.C., G.L., P.M.M., M.X.L., E.K.A.), Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Akpek EK; From the Ocular Surface Disease Clinic, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (D.C., G.L., P.M.M., M.X.L., E.K.A.), Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: esakpek@jhmi.edu.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 258: 14-21, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37793479
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To report the heterogeneity in methodology of clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval of topical dry eye treatments.

DESIGN:

Comparative analysis of clinical trials' methods.

METHODS:

We reviewed the online, publicly available FDA database, application review files, ClinicalTrials.gov registry records, and journal articles for each FDA-approved topical dry eye treatment. For each trial, we extracted information about the study, patient demographics, treatment names and doses, sample size in each arm, and the measurement instrument in a systematic fashion.

RESULTS:

Fourteen trials were included that assessed 5 topical treatments for dry eye (cyclosporine 0.05%, cyclosporine 0.09%, lifitegrast 5%, and loteprednol 0.25% eye drops and varenicline 0.03-mg nasal spray). Median treatment duration was 12 weeks (range, 2-24 weeks). In all trials, treatments, including varying concentrations of the same treatment, were compared with vehicle. Twelve trials (85.7%) evaluated a primary clinician-measured clinical sign, and 10 trials (71.4%) evaluated a primary patient-reported symptom. Corneal staining was the most frequently evaluated clinical sign primary outcome, reported in half (6 of 12) of the trials, and was graded using 4 different scoring systems. Conjunctival staining, conjunctival hyperemia, and tear production were each measured using 2 different scoring systems. Ocular discomfort, the only patient-reported symptom primary outcome, was measured using 5 different instruments.

CONCLUSION:

A variety of outcome measures were used in these clinical trials. Clinically meaningful dry eye outcome measures and standardized measurements can optimize the assessment of and comparison of therapeutic benefits.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndromes de Ojo Seco Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndromes de Ojo Seco Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article