Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Specialist Care on Teenage and Young Adult Patient-Reported Outcomes in England: A BRIGHTLIGHT Study.
Taylor, Rachel M; Whelan, Jeremy S; Barber, Julie A; Alvarez-Galvez, Javier; Feltbower, Richard G; Gibson, Faith; Stark, Dan P; Fern, Lorna A.
Afiliación
  • Taylor RM; Centre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Profession Led Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Whelan JS; Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Barber JA; Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Alvarez-Galvez J; Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain.
  • Feltbower RG; Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • Gibson F; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
  • Stark DP; Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Fern LA; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Leeds, United Kingdom.
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol ; 13(3): 492-501, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285524
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

In England, health care policy promotes specialized age-appropriate cancer services for teenagers and young adults (TYA), for those aged 13-24 years at diagnosis. Specialist Principal Treatment Centers (PTCs) provide enhanced age-specific care for TYA, although many still receive all or some of their care in adult or children's cancer services. Our aim was to determine the patient-reported outcomes associated with TYA-PTC based care.

Methods:

We conducted a multicenter cohort study, recruiting 1114 TYA aged 13-24 years at diagnosis. Data collection involved a bespoke survey at 6,12,18, 24, and 36 months after diagnosis. Confounder adjusted analyses of perceived social support, illness perception, anxiety and depression, and health status, compared patients receiving NO-TYA-PTC care with those receiving ALL-TYA-PTC and SOME-TYA-PTC care.

Results:

Eight hundred and thirty completed the first survey. There was no difference in perceived social support, anxiety, or depression between the three categories of care. Significantly higher illness perception was observed in the ALL-TYA-PTC and SOME-TYA-PTC group compared to the NO-TYA-PTC group, (adjusted difference in mean (ADM) score on Brief Illness Perception scale 2.28 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.48-4.09) and 2.93 [1.27-4.59], respectively, p = 0.002). Similarly, health status was significantly better in the NO-TYA-PTC (ALL-TYA-PTC ADM -0.011 [95%CI -0.046 to 0.024] and SOME-TYA-PTC -0.054 [-0.086 to -0.023]; p = 0.006).

Conclusion:

The reason for the difference in perceived health status is unclear. TYA who accessed a TYA-PTC (all or some care) had higher perceived illness. This may reflect greater education and promotion of self-care by health care professionals in TYA units.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article