Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Detomidine or Romifidine in Combination with Morphine for Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Horses.
Vullo, Cecilia; Gugliandolo, Enrico; Biondi, Vito; Biffarella, Marco; Catone, Giuseppe; Tambella, Adolfo Maria.
Afiliación
  • Vullo C; Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno D'Alcontres, 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.
  • Gugliandolo E; Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Polo SS. Annunziata, 98169 Messina, Italy.
  • Biondi V; Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Polo SS. Annunziata, 98169 Messina, Italy.
  • Biffarella M; Independent Researcher, Via Anna Salamone, 7, 98073 Mistretta, Italy.
  • Catone G; Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Polo SS. Annunziata, 98169 Messina, Italy.
  • Tambella AM; School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy.
Vet Sci ; 11(3)2024 Mar 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38535858
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to determine the most appropriate sedation protocol for a standing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in horses, comparing continuous rate infusions (CRIs) of detomidine and romifidine combined with a single bolus of morphine. Sixteen horses referred for standing low-field open-magnet MRI were randomly assigned to one of two sedation protocols. The horses were premedicated with 0.03 mg/kg of intramuscular acepromazine, and those animals belonging to Group D received an intravenous (IV) loading dose of detomidine (0.01 mg/kg) 30 min later, while those of Group R received romifidine (0.04 mg/kg). If the horses were inadequately sedated, an additional dose of IV detomidine (0.005 mg/kg) or romifidine (0.02 mg/kg) was administered, according to the animal's group. During the MRI, a single IV bolus of morphine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered, and according to which group it belonged to, the animal started the administration of detomidine (0.01 mg/kg/h) or romifidine (0.02 mg/kg/h). Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), rectal temperature (RT), depth of sedation, and degree of ataxia were evaluated every 10 min during MRI. Two horses belonging to Group D and four horses from Group R needed additional sedation before entering the MRI unit because they were unsatisfactorily sedated. No side effects were observed following morphine bolus administration. During the MRI procedure, five horses in Group R received an additional IV romifidine bolus (0.01 mg/kg) because the depth of sedation score was 1 and the ataxia score was 0. Any substantial differences were recorded between the two treatments in terms of HR, RR, and RT. In conclusion, at the doses used, a detomidine-morphine combination following a CRI of detomidine appears more suitable than a romifidine-morphine combination following a CRI of romifidine for maintaining an adequate depth of sedation and adequate immobility in horses undergoing standing MRI.
Palabras clave