Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Tolerability of Intranasal Midazolam Administration for Antiseizure Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review.
Dittrich, Tolga D; Vock, Dominik; Fisch, Urs; Hert, Lisa; Baumann, Sira M; Kliem, Paulina S C; Rüegg, Stephan; Marsch, Stephan; De Marchis, Gian Marco; Sutter, Raoul.
Afiliación
  • Dittrich TD; Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Vock D; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Fisch U; Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Hert L; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Baumann SM; Intensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medical Care, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Kliem PSC; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Rüegg S; Intensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medical Care, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Marsch S; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • De Marchis GM; Intensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medical Care, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Sutter R; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Neurocrit Care ; 2024 Apr 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580802
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal midazolam (in-MDZ) administration for antiseizure treatment in adults.

METHODS:

Embase and Medline literature databases were searched. We included randomized trials and cohort studies (excluding case series) of adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) examining in-MDZ administration for epilepsy, epileptic seizures, or status epilepticus published in English between 1985 and 2022. Studies were screened for eligibility based on predefined criteria. The primary outcome was the efficacy of in-MDZ administration, and the secondary outcome was its tolerability. Extracted data included study design, patient characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

RESULTS:

A total of 12 studies with 929 individuals treated with in-MDZ were included. Most studies were retrospective, with their number increasing over time. Administered in-MDZ doses ranged from 2.5 to 20 mg per single dose. The mean proportion of successful seizure termination after first in-MDZ administration was 72.7% (standard deviation [SD] 18%), and the proportion of seizure recurrence or persistent seizures ranged from 61 to 75%. Most frequent adverse reactions to in-MDZ were dizziness (mean 23.5% [SD 38.6%]), confusion (one study; 17.4%), local irritation (mean 16.6% [SD 9.6%]), and sedation (mean 12.7% [SD 9.7%]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Administration of in-MDZ seems promising for the treatment of prolonged epileptic seizures and seizure clusters in adults. Limited evidence suggests that intranasal administration is safe. Further research is warranted because of the heterogeneity of cohorts, the variation in dosages, and the lack of uniformity in defining successful seizure termination.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article