Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efgartigimod and Ravulizumab for Treating Acetylcholine Receptor Auto-antibody-Positive (AChR-Ab+) Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Indirect Treatment Comparison.
van Steen, Cécile; Celico, Lorenzo; Spaepen, Erik; Hagenacker, Tim; Meuth, Sven G; Ruck, Tobias; Smith, A Gordon; Bodicoat, Danielle H; de Francesco, Maria; Iannazzo, Sergio.
Afiliación
  • van Steen C; Argenx BV, 9052, Zwijnaarde (Ghent), Belgium. cvansteen93@gmail.com.
  • Celico L; HEOR Value Hub, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Spaepen E; HEOR Value Hub, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Hagenacker T; University Medicine Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany.
  • Meuth SG; University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Ruck T; University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Smith AG; VCU Department of Neurology, Richmond, VA, USA.
  • Bodicoat DH; HEOR Value Hub, Brussels, Belgium.
  • de Francesco M; HEOR Value Hub, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Iannazzo S; Argenx BV, 9052, Zwijnaarde (Ghent), Belgium.
Adv Ther ; 41(6): 2486-2499, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642198
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Efgartigimod and ravulizumab, both approved for treating acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), have not been directly compared. This paper assessed comparative effects of efgartigimod vs. ravulizumab for treating adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG using indirect treatment comparison methods.

METHODS:

The matching-adjusted indirect comparison used data from two randomized trials of adult men and women. The ADAPT (efgartigimod vs. placebo; individual patient data available) population was reweighted to match the CHAMPION (ravulizumab vs. placebo; index study; aggregate data available) population. The relative effect of efgartigimod versus placebo was estimated in this reweighted population and compared with the observed ravulizumab versus placebo effect to estimate the efgartigimod versus ravulizumab effect. The outcomes were Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item-revised scale (MG-QoL15r) assessed as cumulative effect (area under the curve; AUC) over 26 weeks (primary) and change from baseline at 4 weeks and time of best response (week 4 for efgartigimod; week 26 for ravulizumab).

RESULTS:

For MG-QoL15r, efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement compared with ravulizumab over 26 weeks [mean difference (95% confidence interval) - 52.6 (- 103.0, - 2.3)], at week 4 [- 4.0 (- 6.6, - 1.4)], and at time of best response [- 3.9 (- 6.5, - 1.3)]. Efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement over ravulizumab in MG-ADL at week 4 [- 1.9 (- 3.3, - 0.5)] and at time of best response [- 1.4 (- 2.8, 0.0)] and in QMG at week 4 [- 3.2 (- 5.2, - 1.2)] and at time of best response [- 3.0 (- 5.0, - 1.0)]. For AUC over 26 weeks, improvements were not significantly different between efgartigimod and ravulizumab for MG-ADL [- 8.7 (- 36.1, 18.8)] and QMG [- 13.7 (- 50.3, 22.9)].

CONCLUSION:

Efgartigimod may provide a faster and greater improvement over 26 weeks in quality of life than ravulizumab in adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Efgartigimod showed faster improvements in MG-ADL and QMG than ravulizumab.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Receptores Colinérgicos / Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados / Miastenia Gravis Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Receptores Colinérgicos / Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados / Miastenia Gravis Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article