Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contemporary trends of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States.
Khan, Muhammad Z; Nassar, Sameh; Nguyen, Amanda; Khan, Muhammad Usman; Sattar, Yasar; Alruwaili, Waleed; Gonuguntla, Karthik; Mazek, Haitham; Asad, Zain Ul Abideen; Agarwal, Siddharth; Raina, Sameer; Balla, Sudarshan; Nguyen, Bao; Fan, Dali; Darden, Douglas; Munir, Muhammad Bilal.
Afiliación
  • Khan MZ; Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
  • Nassar S; Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
  • Nguyen A; Department of Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
  • Khan MU; Division of Cardiology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Sattar Y; Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
  • Alruwaili W; Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
  • Gonuguntla K; Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
  • Mazek H; Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
  • Asad ZUA; Division of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
  • Agarwal S; Division of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
  • Raina S; Division of Cardiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Balla S; Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
  • Nguyen B; Department of Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
  • Fan D; Department of Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
  • Darden D; Division of Cardiology, Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
  • Munir MB; Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 35(7): 1351-1359, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695242
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Leadless pacemakers (LPM) have established themselves as the important therapeutic modality in management of selected patients with symptomatic bradycardia. To determine real-world utilization and in-hospital outcomes of LPM implantation since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2016.

METHODS:

For this retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2016-2020. The outcomes analyzed in our study included implantation trends of LPM over study years, mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention, any vascular complication, or acute kidney injury), length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. Implantation trends of LPM were assessed using linear regression. Using years 2016-2017 as a reference, adjusted outcomes of mortality, major complications, prolonged length of stay (defined as >6 days), and increased hospitalization cost (defined as median cost >34 098$) were analyzed for subsequent years using a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS:

There was a gradual increased trend of LPM implantation over our study years (3230 devices in years 2016-2017 to 11 815 devices in year 2020, p for trend <.01). The adjusted mortality improved significantly after LPM implantation in subsequent years compared to the reference years 2016-2017 (aOR for the year 2018 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.73; aOR for the year 2019 0.49, 95% CI 0.41-0.59; and aOR for the year 2020 0.52, 95% CI 0.44-0.62). No differences in adjusted rates of major complications were demonstrated over the subsequent years. The adjusted cost of hospitalization was higher for the years 2019 (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.22-1.46) and 2020 (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.55-1.84).

CONCLUSION:

The contemporary US practice has shown significantly increased implantation rates of LPM since its approval with reduced rates of inpatient mortality.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Bases de Datos Factuales / Costos de Hospital / Tiempo de Internación Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Bases de Datos Factuales / Costos de Hospital / Tiempo de Internación Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article