Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Skill Level on the Integration of Information and Post-Error Adjustment during Action Anticipation in Basketball.
Chen, Zhefu; Wang, Danlei; Fang, Wenxuan; Luan, Mengkai.
Afiliación
  • Chen Z; School of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
  • Wang D; School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.
  • Fang W; School of Athletic Performance, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.
  • Luan M; School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.
Behav Sci (Basel) ; 14(5)2024 May 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785914
ABSTRACT
The present study examined the impact of skill level on the integration of contextual prior information and kinematic information alongside post-error adjustment during action anticipation in basketball. Twenty-three collegiate basketball players and twenty-three control participants engaged in anticipating as quickly and accurately as possible the outcomes of free throws, utilizing video clips depicting basketball players' actions, both with and without contextual prior information. Anticipatory performance and the difference in anticipatory performance following errors and correct responses were analyzed based on skill level and the congruency of contextual prior information (none, congruent, and incongruent). The findings revealed that the congruency of contextual prior information significantly affects action anticipation, with skill level moderating this effect. Moreover, skill level influenced the congruency effect on accuracy discrepancies between post-error and post-correct trials during action anticipation, with controls showing greater sensitivity to previous trial performance compared to experts. These results provide further evidence for the notion that individuals employ Bayesian reliability-based strategies to integrate different information sources and underscore the role of skill level in adjusting anticipatory judgments following errors during action anticipation. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive and behavioral mechanisms that differentiate skill levels in action anticipation, potentially guiding the development of targeted training interventions.
Palabras clave