Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differential expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in various pathological types of salivary gland cancers.
Fujiwara, Hajime; Kodama, Yoshinori; Shimoda, Hikari; Teshima, Masanori; Shinomiya, Hirotaka; Nibu, Ken-Ichi.
Afiliación
  • Fujiwara H; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1, Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
  • Kodama Y; Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Osaka International Cancer Center Institute, 3-1-69, Otemae, Chuo-Ku, 541-8567, Japan.
  • Shimoda H; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1, Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
  • Teshima M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1, Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
  • Shinomiya H; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1, Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan. Electronic address: hshino@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.
  • Nibu KI; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1, Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 51(4): 755-760, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852332
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

While several studies reported epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in salivary gland cancer (SGC), results varied due to a lack of unified definition of EGFR positivity. In this study, we assessed the EGFR expression level using both EGFR positive score and cumulative EGFR score in the patients with SGC.

METHODS:

Between January 2010 and April 2021, 102 patients with SGC who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry. The membrane staining intensity was scored as follows no staining (0), weak staining (1+), intermediate staining (2+), and strong staining (3+). The cumulative EGFR score was determined on a continuous scale of 0-300 using the formula1 × (1+ percentage of weakly stained cells) + 2 × (2+ percentage of moderately stained cells) + 3 × (3+ percentage of strongly stained cells).

RESULTS:

EGFR expression in SGC varied widely even among the same as well as different histopathological types. The average EGFR positive scores were 46.0 %, 55.7 %, 51.6 %, 1.0 %, 26.8 %, 50 %, and 76.8 % for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC), adenocarcinoma NOS (ACNOS), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CAexPA), and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), respectively. The average cumulative EGFR scores were 82, 91, 80, 1, 52, 93, and 185 for MEC, SDC, AdCC, AcCC, ACNOS, CAexPA, and SqCC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

EGFR positive scores and cumulative EGFR scores in SGCs varied among the various histological types, and even in the same histological type. These scores may predict the clinical outcome of SGC treated with EGFR-targeting therapies, such as head and neck photoimmunotherapy, and need to be evaluated in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de las Glándulas Salivales / Carcinoma Mucoepidermoide / Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico / Adenoma Pleomórfico / Receptores ErbB Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de las Glándulas Salivales / Carcinoma Mucoepidermoide / Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico / Adenoma Pleomórfico / Receptores ErbB Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article