Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Treatment of Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Single-Center, Non-randomized Study with 2-Year Follow-Up.
Jeyaraman, Madhan; Jeyaraman, Naveen; Ramasubramanian, Swaminathan; Ranjan, Rajni; Jha, Saurabh Kumar; Gupta, Ashim.
Afiliación
  • Jeyaraman M; Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India.
  • Jeyaraman N; Department of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201310 India.
  • Ramasubramanian S; Clinical Research Associate, Virginia Tech India, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095 India.
  • Ranjan R; South Texas Orthopaedic Research Institute (STORI Inc.), Laredo, TX 78045 USA.
  • Jha SK; Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India.
  • Gupta A; Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600002 India.
Indian J Orthop ; 58(7): 894-904, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38948370
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread, disabling condition with no intervention to fully restore cartilage or halt progression. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), an autologous product from bone marrow aspiration, has shown promise as a regenerative therapy due to its cell composition and chondrogenic effects. Our study aims to assess the functional outcomes, including pain, function, satisfaction, and complications post-BMAC injection in knee OA patients. Materials and

Methods:

In this prospective, single-center study, 63 patients with grade II-III knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scale) unresponsive to conservative management underwent BMAC injection. The procedure involved bone marrow aspiration from the anterior iliac crest, processing to obtain a concentrate, followed by intra-articular injection. Patients were followed for 24 months, assessing outcomes using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and MOCART 2.0 score.

Results:

The cohort, with a slight female predominance and predominantly aged 41-50 years, majorly comprised K-L grade III OA patients. BMAC treatment resulted in significant improvements in VAS pain scores, IKDC functional scores, and MOCART 2.0 scores over the 24-month follow-up.

Conclusion:

BMAC injection provides significant improvement in both pain and functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up in patients with mild-to-moderate OA of the knee. Further high-quality, adequately powered, multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are necessary to justify the routine clinical use of BMAC for treatment of patients suffering with knee OA.
Palabras clave