Integrative Analysis for Identification of Therapeutic Targets and Prognostic Signatures in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Differential expressions of certain genes during tumorigenesis may serve to identify novel manageable targets in the clinic. In this work with an integrated bioinformatics approach, we analyzed public microarray datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to explore the key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We identified a total of 984 common DEGs in 252 healthy and 254 NSCLC gene expression samples. The top 10 DEGs as a result of pathway enrichment and protein-protein interaction analysis were further investigated for their prognostic performances. Among these, we identified high expressions of CDC20, AURKA, CDK1, EZH2, and CDKN2A genes that were associated with significantly poorer overall survival in NSCLC patients. On the contrary, high mRNA expressions of CBL, FYN, LRKK2, and SOCS2 were associated with a significantly better prognosis. Furthermore, our drug target analysis for these hub genes suggests a potential use of Trichostatin A, Pracinostat, TGX-221, PHA-793887, AG-879, and IMD0354 antineoplastic agents to reverse the expression of these DEGs in NSCLC patients.

Evaluation of the effects of the low-level laser therapy on swelling, pain, and trismus after removal of impacted lower third molar.

BACKGROUND: In current study we aimed to examine the effect of a low-level laser therapy on the pain, mouth opening and swelling of patients whose impacted 3rd molar tooth was extracted in addition measurement volumetrically to the edema with 3dMD face system. METHODS: It was surveyed 15 patients who had bilateral symmetric lower 3rd molars. Surgical sides of patients were randomly separated into two groups: the study group and the control group. It was applied extra oral low-level laser therapy (LLLT, 0.3 W, 40 s, 4 J/cm(2)) to the study group (n = 15) after the surgical operation and on the 2nd day. Only routine postoperative recommendation (ice application) was made in the control (n = 15) group. The maximum mouth opening, pain level and facial swelling evaluated. 3dMD Face® (3dMD, Atlanta, GA) Photogrammetric System was used to evaluate volumetric changes of the swelling. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the edema and interincisal opening between the groups and the pain level in the laser group was significantly lower than in the control group on the 7(th) postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were decreasing trismus, swelling, and pain level, with this LLLT, there was significant difference only in the 7th day pain level in the laser group compared with the control group.

Comparison of the Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Ozone Therapy on Bone Healing.

This study aims to compare the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and ozone therapy on the bone healing. Thirty-six adult male Wistar albino rats were used for this study. Monocortical defects were shaped in right femur of all rats. Defects were filled with nano-hydroxyapatite graft. The animals were divided into 3 groups and each group was than divided into 2 subgroups. Then, LLLT with a diode laser was applied to the first group (G1), ozone therapy was applied to the second group (G2), and no treatment was applied to the third group as a control group (G3). Animals were sacrificed after 4th and 8th weeks and the sections were examined to evaluate the density of the inflammation, the formation of connective tissue, the osteogenic potential, and osteocalcin activity. As a result, there were no significant differences among the groups of 4 weeks in terms of new bone formation. In the immunohistochemical assessment, the number of osteocalcin-positive cells was higher in the laser group compared to the other group of 4 weeks; this difference was statistically significant in the LLLT and ozone groups (P < 0.05). Histomorphometric assessment showed that the new bone areas were higher in the LLLT and ozone groups; furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference in the LLLT in comparison with the control group at 8th week (P < 0.05). At the same time immunohistochemical assessment showed that osteocalcin-positive cells were considerably higher in G2 than G1 at 8th week (P < 0.05). The findings of this study may be the result of differences in the number of treatment sessions. Further studies are therefore needed to determine the optimal treatment modality.