Effects of haemodynamically atrio-ventricular optimized His bundle pacing on heart failure symptoms and exercise capacity: the His Optimized Pacing Evaluated for Heart Failure (HOPE-HF) randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial.

AIMS: Excessive prolongation of PR interval impairs coupling of atrio-ventricular (AV) contraction, which reduces left ventricular pre-load and stroke volume, and worsens symptoms. His bundle pacing allows AV delay shortening while maintaining normal ventricular activation. HOPE-HF evaluated whether AV optimized His pacing is preferable to no-pacing, in a double-blind cross-over fashion, in patients with heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, PR interval ≥200 ms and either QRS ≤140 ms or right bundle branch block. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients had atrial and His bundle leads implanted (and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead if clinically indicated) and were randomized to 6 months of pacing and 6 months of no-pacing utilizing a cross-over design. The primary outcome was peak oxygen uptake during symptom-limited exercise. Quality of life, LVEF and patients' holistic symptomatic preference between arms were secondary outcomes. Overall, 167 patients were randomized: 90% men, 69 ± 10 years, QRS duration 124 ± 26 ms, PR interval 249 ± 59 ms, LVEF 33 ± 9%. Neither peak oxygen uptake (+0.25 ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.23 to +0.73, p = 0.3) nor LVEF (+0.5%, 95% CI -0.7 to 1.6, p = 0.4) changed with pacing but Minnesota Living with Heart Failure quality of life improved significantly (-3.7, 95% CI -7.1 to -0.3, p = 0.03). Seventy-six percent of patients preferred His bundle pacing-on and 24% pacing-off (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: His bundle pacing did not increase peak oxygen uptake but, under double-blind conditions, significantly improved quality of life and was symptomatically preferred by the clear majority of patients. Ventricular pacing delivered via the His bundle did not adversely impact ventricular function during the 6 months.

Usefulness of a clinical risk score to predict the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Almost 1/3 of heart failure patients fail to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). A simple clinical score to predict who these patients are at the moment of referral or at time of implant may be of importance for early optimization of their management. METHODS: Observational study. A risk score was derived from factors associated to CRT response. The derivation cohort was composed of 1301 patients implanted with a CRT defibrillator in a multi-center French cohort-study. External validation of this score and assessment of its association with CRT response and all-cause mortality and/or heart transplant was performed in 1959 CRT patients implanted in 4 high-volume European centers. RESULTS: Independent predictors of CRT response in the derivation cohort were: female gender (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.26-3.45), NYHA class ≤ III (OR = 2.71, 95% CI 1.63-4.52), left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 25% (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.27-2.41), QRS duration ≥ 150 ms (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.25-2.30) and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.48-2.72). Each was assigned 1 point. External validation showed good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test-P = 0.95), accuracy (Brier score = 0.19) and discrimination (c-statistic = 0.67), with CRT response increasing progressively from 37.5% in patients with a score of 0 to 91.9% among those with score of 5 (Gamma for trend = 0.44, P < 0.001). Similar results were observed regarding all-cause mortality or heart transplant. CONCLUSION: The ScREEN score (Sex category, Renal function, ECG/QRS width, Ejection fraction and NYHA class) is composed of widely validated, easy to obtain predictors of CRT response, and predicts CRT response and overall mortality. It should be helpful in facilitating early consideration of alternative therapies for predicted non-responders to CRT therapy.

Ripple mapping: Initial multicenter experience of an intuitive approach to overcoming the limitations of 3D activation mapping.

BACKGROUND: Ripple mapping (RM) displays electrograms as moving bars over a three-dimensional surface displaying bipolar voltage, and has shown in a single-center series to be effective for atrial tachycardia (AT) mapping without annotation of local activation time or window-of-interest assignment. We tested the reproducibility of these findings in operators naïve to RM, using it for the first time in postablation AT. METHODS: Maps were collected with multielectrode catheters and CARTO ConfiDENSE. A diagnosis of the tachycardia mechanism was made using RM and an assessment of operator confidence was made according to a three-grade scale (1 highest-3 lowest). RESULTS: The first 20 patients (64 ± 9 years, median two previous ablations) undergoing RM-guided AT ablation across five sites were studied. High-density maps (2,935 ± 1,328 points) in AT (CL = 296 ± 95 milliseconds) were collected. Macroreentrant ATs bordered by scar or anatomical obstacles were identified in n = 12 (60%), small reentrant ATs around scar in n = 3 (15%), and focal ATs from scar in n = 5 (25%). Diagnostic confidence with RM was grade 1 in n = 13 (65%), where operators felt confident to proceed to ablation without entrainment. Ablation offered the correct diagnosis n = 18 (90%). Retrospective review of the accompanying LAT maps demonstrated potential sources for error related to the window of interest selection, interpolation, and differentiating regions of scar during tachycardia on the voltage map. CONCLUSION: RM was easy to adopt by operators using it for the first time, and identified the correct target for ablation with high diagnostic confidence in most cases of complex AT.