Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 154(1): 9-15, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20926175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outpatient hysteroscopy is increasingly being used as a cost-effective alternative to in-patient hysteroscopy under general anaesthesia. Like other outpatient gynaecological procedures, however, it has the potential to cause pain severe enough for the procedure to be abandoned. There are no national guidelines on pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy. METHODS: A postal survey of UK gynaecologists was carried out to evaluate current clinical practice regarding methods of pain relief used during office hysteroscopy. A total of 250 questionnaires were sent out and 115 responses received. RESULTS: Outpatient hysteroscopy was offered by 76.5% of respondents. Respondents reported a wide variation in the use of routine and rescue analgesia, and also in the nature of the analgesia used. One-quarter of those offering outpatient hysteroscopy used no form of analgesia. CONCLUSION: The results showed that whilst there is no consensus on the type of analgesia provided, rescue analgesia is commonly being used, particularly in the form of intracervical blocks.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Analgesia/methods , Hysteroscopy/methods , Pain Management , Ambulatory Care/economics , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/methods , Female , Humans , Hysteroscopy/adverse effects , Hysteroscopy/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Preanesthetic Medication , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL