Which Men Do or Do Not Achieve Long-Term Symptom Relief After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP): 11 Years of HoLEP Experience.

Purpose: Apart from the existing level-one evidence, few centers have reported on long-term outcomes after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). Against this backdrop we aimed to report on our treatment experience and identify predictors of persistent/recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after the procedure. Materials and Methods: From 2006 to 2017, 2566 men underwent HoLEP at our institution. Only patients with available, cross-sectional follow-up (F/u) ≥6 months were included. Perioperative and F/u characteristics were compared by duration of F/u in months (quartiles). Multivariable logistic regression models (MVAs) were used to identify predictors of persistent/recurring symptoms, defined as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >7 at F/u. Results: A total of 774 patients with a median age of 70 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 66-75), prostate volume of 80 mL (IQR = 60-105), American Society of Anesthesiologists score 2 (IQR = 2-3), IPSS of 19 (IQR = 14-24), and quality of life (QoL) of 4 (3-5) at the time of operation were analyzed. Median F/u was 52 months (IQR = 32-77), overall current median prostate-specific antigen was 0.91 mg/dL (0.5-1.8), median IPSS and QoL were 3 (IQR = 1-7) and 1 (IQR 0-2), respectively. LUTS medication was present in 20 patients (2.6%), 15 (2%) patients required reoperation, and permanent urinary incontinence was present in 17 (2.2%) patients. On MVA age at operation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.1; p = 0.013), prostate volume (OR = 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-0.99;], p = 0.003), body mass index (OR = 1.06 [95% CI, 1.0-1.1], p = 0.043), presence of indwelling catheter (OR = 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.81], p = 0.004), and anticholinergics before procedure (OR = 1.74 [95% CI, 1.01-3.0], p = 0.046) were predictors of persistent/recurring symptoms. Conclusions: Our HoLEP experience confirms durable and profound symptom relief in the vast majority men. A small fraction of patients complained about subjective persistent/recurring LUTS stressing the need for proper patient selection and timing of surgical intervention.

[Contemporary surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction in Germany : A population-wide study based on German hospital quality report data from 2006 to 2019]. / Die operative Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms in Deutschland : Eine Darstellung der Versorgungssituation auf Basis der Qualitätsberichte von 2006 bis 2019.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has greatly evolved in recent years. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to present contemporary management and trends for surgical BPO therapy in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disease and procedure rates were extracted using the online platform reimbursement.INFO that is based on German hospital quality report data. For the diagnosis of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), the ICD codes N40 and D29.1 were used. For evaluation of the surgical procedures OPS codes 5­600.0, 5­601, 5­603, 5­609.4 and 5­609.8 including their subcodes were used. In addition to descriptive analyses, trend and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: In 2019, a total of 83,687 procedures for BPO in 473 urological departments were performed. The most common (71.7%) surgery was transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P). Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP; 9.5%) and surgical adenomectomy (5.6%) were the second and third most common procedures. Less often thulium laser enucleation (ThuLEP; 3.1%), laser vaporisation (2.9%) and electrical vaporisation (2.8%) were performed. All other techniques were performed in < 1%. Rates of HoLEP, ThuLEP and electrovaporisation have increased since 2006 (HoLEP: +42.42%/year, p < 0.001; ThuLEP: +20.6%/year, p = 0.99; electrovaporisation +43.42%/year, p < 0.001), while surgical adenomectomy decreased (-1.66%/year, p < 0.01). In 2019 mean length of hospital stay was 5.1 ± 0.1 days. CONCLUSIONS: TUR­P remains the most often performed surgical treatment for BPO. Laser therapy-especially in centers-is increasing, while surgical adenomectomy continues to abate.

Assessing the Outcome of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate by Age, Prostate Volume, and a History of Blood Thinning Agents: Report from a Single-Center Series of >1800 Consecutive Cases.

Purpose: To assess perioperative outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in a real-world scenario and with a focus on demanding patient factors, such as large prostate size, advanced patient age, and anticoagulation therapy (AT). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed HoLEP procedures at our institution between 2010 and 2016. After stratification by prostate volume, age, and AT, perioperative and early voiding characteristics were compared. A multivariable regression model was employed to identify predictors of prolonged time of catheterization (defined as being above group's median). Results: The study cohort consisted of 1816 men with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-76), a median prostate volume of 80 mL (IQR: 58-105), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 in 618 men (34%). Median time of enucleation and morcellation was 43 minutes (IQR: 31-60) and 10 minutes (IQR: 6-18), respectively. Perioperative blood transfusions were administered in 44 (2.4%) cases, severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3b) occurred in 61 (3.3%) cases. The median time of catheterization was 2 days (IQR: 2-2), with prolonged catheterization occurring in 277 (15%) cases. After adjustment, large prostates (fourth volume quartile [106-280 mL]) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-2.6, p = 0.001), therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin bridging regimen (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4-3.6, p = 0.037), low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.2, p = 0.015), and a history of direct oral anticoagulation (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.0, p = 0.022), but not patient age, were independently associated with prolonged catheterization. Conclusions: We confirm HoLEP as safe and efficient; however, patients with large prostates and patients with a history of AT are at risk of prolonged catheterization.

From "gold standard" resection to reproducible "future standard" endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: what we know about anatomical enucleation.

BACKGROUND: Open prostatectomy (OP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) have traditionally been the most common surgical approaches for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia causing bladder outlet obstruction and have certainly passed the test of time. In time, many endoscopic surgical procedures have been described as an alternative mini-invasive treatment. Holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) guaranteed functional outcomes similar to OP and TURP with lower perioperative complication rates for any prostate size. With the development of different kinds of lasers (such as thulium, "green light" and diode) and bipolar energy, the feasibility of endoscopic enucleation using these energies has been explored. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In this paper, recent techniques to perform true prostate enucleation have been reviewed through a search of PubMed and Web of Science, including articles published in the last 20 years in clinical journals. The review is based on a peer-review process of the authors after a structured data search. Search terms included "Thulium prostate enucleation, THULEP, TmLEP/Tm Yag enucleation" OR "Greenlight enucleation/prostate enucleation/vapo-enucleation/KTP prostate enucleation, PVP prostate enucleation, GreenLep/" OR "bipolar prostate enucleation" OR "HoLEP, Holmium prostate enucleation" OR "monopolar prostate enucleation" OR "Diode prostate enucleation" OR "DiLEP" OR "Eraser prostate enucleation" OR "ELEP". EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Following the example of HoLEP, many techniques have been described in the literature using a variety of energy sources and instruments either in a pure enucleative or a hybrid (mixed) fashion. However, the levels of evidence are too low and follow-up still too short to offer solid recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP has become the conceptual and practical paradigm for the wide spread of enucleation thanks to the evidence provided by the literature and excellent outcomes. Higher level of evidence is required to assess efficacy of alternative enucleative techniques.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update.

CONTEXT: A number of transurethral ablative techniques based on the use of innovative medical devices have been introduced in the recent past for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transurethral ablative procedures for BPO. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was performed for all RCTs comparing any transurethral surgical technique for BPO to another between 1992 and 2013. Efficacy was evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 1 yr based on International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum flow rate, and postvoid residual volume. Efficacy at midterm follow-up, prostate volume, perioperative data, and short-term and long-term complications were also assessed. Data were analyzed using RevMan software. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 69 RCTs (8517 enrolled patients) were included. No significant difference was found in terms of short-term efficacy between bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP). However, B-TURP was associated with a lower rate of perioperative complications. Better short-term efficacy outcomes, fewer immediate complications, and a shorter hospital stay were found after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) compared with M-TURP. Compared with M-TURP, GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) was associated with a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications but no different short-term efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that HoLEP is associated with more favorable outcomes than M-TURP in published RCTs. B-TURP and PVP have resulted in better perioperative outcomes without significant differences regarding efficacy parameters after short-term follow-up compared with M-TURP. Further studies are needed to provide long-term comparative data and head-to head comparisons of emerging techniques. PATIENT SUMMARY: Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate, photovaporization of the prostate, and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate have shown efficacy outcomes comparable with conventional techniques yet reduce the complication rate. The respective role of these new options in the surgical armamentarium needs to be refined to propose tailored surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction relief.

Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate and simple open prostatectomy--which procedure is faster?

PURPOSE: The longer operative time of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate compared to transurethral resection of the prostate or simple open prostatectomy reported in the literature might have been biased by the unavailability of a soft tissue morcellator, limited surgical experience with holmium laser prostate enucleation or the fact that significantly more tissue was removed by enucleation than by resection. We objectively compared the resection speed of contemporary holmium laser enucleation vs transurethral resection of the prostate and of holmium laser enucleation vs simple open prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 100 cases of transurethral prostate resection and 60 of simple open prostatectomy from our previous randomized, controlled trials. These cases were subjected to matched pair analysis with greater than 1,000 from our prospective contemporary database on holmium laser prostate enucleation. Exact matches were made for the same amount of resected tissue. In all contemporary holmium laser enucleation cases a mechanical soft tissue morcellator was used. We calculated and compared the specific resection speed in gm per minute and operative time for the same amount of resected tissue. RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2 we matched 99 exact laser enucleation-transurethral resection pairs and 53 exact laser enucleation-simple open prostatectomy pairs, respectively. Resection speed and operative time for laser enucleation were statistically significantly faster than for resection (0.61 vs 0.51 gm per minute and 62 vs 73 minutes, p <0.01) and similar to those of simple open prostatectomy (0.92 vs 1.0 gm per minute and 101 vs 90 minutes, respectively, p ≥0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Resection speed seems to be an objective criterion for comparing the efficacy of prostatic tissue removal. Based on resection speed holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is faster than transurethral resection of the prostate and similar to simple open prostatectomy.

Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement.

CONTEXT: There is a continuous decline in the number of transurethral resections of the prostate (TURP) and an increase use of minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Current results from randomised controlled trials (RCT) and methodologically sound prospective studies suggest that some of the proposed procedures have the potential to replace TURP. OBJECTIVE: To determine the contemporary status of TURP and of the currently most commonly applied transurethral MISTs: (1) bipolar TURP, (2) bipolar transurethral vaporisation of the prostate (bipolar TUVP), (3) holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and (4) potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser vaporisation of the prostate. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This meta-analysis was based on a systematic Medline search assessing the period 1997-2009. All RCTs comparing TURP and the most commonly discussed ablative treatments were included. The end points of our analyses were functional outcomes and treatment-related adverse events. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven publications involving 23 different RCTs with a total of 2245 patients provided the highest level of evidence available (level 1b) and were fully assessed. Meta-analysis was conducted with SAS v.9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Forest plots were produced using the R software. Pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated between various operative techniques versus TURP. Functional results between the specific transurethral procedures versus TURP were summarised as differences in means. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates statistically comparable efficacy and overall morbidity for MISTs versus contemporary TURP. Type, category (minor vs major), and the number of complications (safety profile) vary specifically for each of the different transurethral techniques. We feel that the individual patient's clinical profile should be carefully assessed to identify the most appropriate transurethral technique.

Thirty-day mortality after transurethral resection of the prostate in patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Seven percent of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who are exposed to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may need transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Our objective was to examine the rate and the predictors of 30-day mortality (30dM) after TURP in patients who were exposed to ADT in a large, contemporary Canadian cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the 30dM rate after TURP in 853 men with the diagnosis of PCa who were treated with primary ADT or radiation therapy followed by ADT. The effect of age, comorbidity (coded according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), number of previous TURP procedures, history of radiation therapy, exposure to antiandrogens, and the type and the duration of ADT before TURP were all tested in univariable and multivariable logistic regression models that predicted 30dM after TURP. RESULTS: During the initial 30 days after TURP, 38 deaths occurred (4.5%, 95% confidence interval: 3.2%-6.2%). Of all variables, the CCI was the only statistically significant (P = 0.001) predictor of 30dM after TURP. The accuracy of CCI in predicting 30dM after TURP in individual patients was 65.1%. Lack of consideration of clinical variables that could predict the 30dM rate after TURP, such as prostate size or prostate-specific antigen level, represents a limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial risk of 30dM is associated with TURP that is performed in patients who are exposed to ADT. Unfortunately, the predictors used in this analysis could not define the individual risk of 30dM with sufficient accuracy. Nonetheless, the average 4.5% risk should be considered at the time of informed consent.

Effect of autologous blood transfusion on the rate of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To test the association between autologous blood transfusion (ABT) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a large group of contemporary patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 1291 patients treated with RP; Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to graphically explore the association between ABT and BCR. Cox regression models addressed the association between ABT and BCR in univariate and multivariate analyses, after adjusting for preoperative prostate specific antigen level, pathological Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node invasion. RESULTS: Of all patients, 205 (15.4%) received perioperative ABT. The mean (median, range) follow-up was 43.2 (40.9, 0.3-145) months. BCR was recorded in 347 (26.9%) patients and the time to BCR was 25.2 (20.5, 0.3-107) months. Neither in univariate (P = 0.053) nor in multivariate (P = 0.2) Cox regression analyses was ABT a statistically significant or independent predictor of BCR. CONCLUSION: Perioperative ABT does not predispose to a higher rate of BCR in patients after RP.

Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To report 3-yr follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: A total of 200 patients with urodynamic obstruction and a prostate volume of less than 100 cc were prospectively randomised and assigned to HoLEP or TURP. All patients were assessed preoperatively and followed at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 mo postoperatively. American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUA SS), maximum flow rate (Q(max)), and postvoid residual (PVR) [urine] volume were obtained at each follow-up. Perioperative data and postoperative outcome were compared. All complications were recorded. RESULTS: AUA SS were significantly better 2 yr postoperatively in the HoLEP group (1.7 vs. 3.9, p<0.0001) and similar at 3 yr (2.7 vs. 3.3, p=0.17). PVR volume was significantly better 2 yr (5.6 vs. 19.9 ml, p<0.001) and 3 yr (8.4 vs. 20.2 ml, p=0.012) postoperatively in HoLEP patients. Q(max) was similar in the HoLEP and TURP groups at 2 yr (28.0 vs. 29.1 ml/s, p=0.83) and at 3 yr (29.0 vs. 27.5 ml/s, p=0.41) postoperatively. Late complications consisted of urethral strictures, bladder-neck contractures, and BPH recurrence; reoperation rates were 7.2% in the HoLEP and 6.6% in the TURP group (p=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: After 2 and 3 yr of follow-up, HoLEP micturition outcomes compare favourably with TURP. Late complications are equally low. HoLEP may be a real alternative to TURP.

Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients.

PURPOSE: Transurethral electrocautery resection (TURP) is generally regarded as the gold standard surgical treatment for bladder outflow obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia despite its rather high morbidity. The high powered holmium:YAG laser can be used endoscopically to enucleate obstructing prostatic tissue in a relatively bloodless manner. The technique of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) was compared to standard TURP for the surgical management of prostate adenomas in a randomized, prospective clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 urodynamically obstructed patients with a prostate of less than 100 gm on transrectal ultrasound were randomized to HoLEP or TURP. All patients were assessed preoperatively, and 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Patient baseline characteristics, perioperative data and postoperative outcome were compared. All complications were noted. RESULTS: HoLEP was significantly superior to TURP in terms of catheter time, hospital stay and hemoglobin loss but operative time was longer. HoLEP and TURP resulted in a significant improvement in American Urological Association symptom scores, peak urinary flow rates and post-void residual urine volumes with symptoms scores and residual volume significantly better in the holmium group. Effects on continence and potency were similar in the 2 groups but adverse events were less frequent in the holmium group. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP and TURP are highly effective procedures for removing obstructing prostatic adenomas. HoLEP resulted in significantly better micturition parameters and less perioperative morbidity.

Does perioperative outcome of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate depend on prostate size?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In conventional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), perioperative morbidity resulting from causes such as blood loss and TUR syndrome increases with prostate size. Therefore, TURP is restricted to small and medium-sized glands. The present study aimed to find out whether perioperative parameters of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) other than operation time and weight of resected tissue were dependent on prostate size. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 384 patients were treated with HoLEP (holmium:YAG laser, 2.0 J, 40 or 50 Hz, 80 or 100 W, 550-nm bare fiber) for acute removal of obstructing benign hyperplastic tissue. Among them, 111 patients (28.9%) had prostates of <40 g (group 1), 152 (39.6%) had prostates of 40 to 79 g (group 2), and 121 (31.5%) had prostates of >/=80 g (range 80-260) (group 3). The perioperative outcomes of the three groups were compared. A total of 346 patients completed the 1-month postoperative assessment. RESULTS: The mean prostate sizes were 31.8 g, 56 g, and 98.7 g for groups 1, 2, and 3 (P<0.0001 group 1 v group 2 v group 3). The mean resected tissue weight was 19.5 g v 34.4 g (P= 0.009) v 70.1 g (range 50-220) (P< 0.0001). The mean operation time was 64.3 v 84.2 (P= 0.009) v 118.4 minutes (P< 0.0001). The mean hemoglobin loss was 0.9 v 1.2 (NS) v 1.9 g/dL (P< 0.001). The overall correlation between hemoglobin loss and prostate size in all patients was very weak (r = 0.229) and just exceeded the level of significance (r = 0.2). In all three groups, the median postoperative catheter time was 1 day, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. The HoLEP resulted in an immediate and significant improvement of American Urological Association Symptom Scores, peak urinary flow rates, and postvoiding residual urine volumes (P< 0.0001) 1 month after the operation, without significant differences between the groups. The rate of complications was similar in all three groups. None of the patients needed blood transfusions. There were no perioperative deaths. CONCLUSION: In HoLEP, perioperative morbidity and postoperative micturition improvement do not depend on prostate size. Therefore, in contrast to TURP, HoLEP is equally suitable for small, medium-size, and large prostate glands.

Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate compared with transvesical open prostatectomy: 18-month follow-up of a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: This ongoing randomized study aims to find out whether transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) could be an alternative to open transvesical prostatectomy in patients with prostates >100 g. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 120 urodynamically obstructed patients were randomized to HoLEP or open prostatectomy, 60 patients to each group. The HoLEP was performed with high-powered Ho:YAG lasers at 80 to 100 W (2.0 J, 40-50 Hz) and 550-nm bare laser fibers. The American Urological Association Symptom Scores, peak urinary flow rates, and postvoiding residual urine volumes were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. All complications were noted. RESULTS: By the Mann-Whitney test, there was no significant difference between the HoLEP and open surgery groups in patient age (69.0 years HoLEP v 71.0 years open surgery), prostate volume (115 cc [range 100-230 cc] v 113 cc [100-230 cc], or weight of resected tissue (94 g [range 57-220 g] v 96 g [range 61-220 g]). There were significant differences in the mean operative time (136 v 91 minutes; P< 0.0001), mean hemoglobin loss (1.9 v 2.8 g/dL; P< 0.0001), median catheter time (1 day v 6 days; P< 0.0001), and median hospital stay (2 days v 10 days; P< 0.0001). Both HoLEP and open prostatectomy resulted in pronounced and lasting postoperative improvements in Symptom Scores, peak urinary flow rates, and postvoiding residual volumes (P< 0.0001). The differences between HoLEP and open prostatectomy were not significant at any interval for any parameter. Blood transfusions were required in 0 HoLEP patients v 8 open surgery patients. Arterial bleeding occurred in three patients in each group. Secondary apical resection was required in two HoLEP patients and no open surgery patients. Bladder neck contracture occurred in none of the HoLEP patients and two of those having open surgery. Thus, the total number of patients having complications was 7 with HoLEP and 13 with open surgery. There were no deaths in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The HoLEP appears to be an endourologic alternative to open surgical enucleation of the prostate for large glands. It entails significantly less blood loss and a much shorter catheter time and hospital stay. The perioperative outcome strongly favors the holmium procedure. The rate of late complications is equally low with each procedure. The postoperative micturition improvement was significant and lasting and was equivalent in the two groups.