Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Br J Cancer ; 104(9): 1487-92, 2011 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21407222

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the apparent protective effect of alcohol intake on renal cell carcinoma may be due to the diluting effect of carcinogens by a high total fluid intake. We assessed the association between intakes of total fluids and of specific beverages on the risk of renal cell carcinoma in a large prospective cohort of UK women. METHODS: Information on beverage consumption was obtained from a questionnaire sent ∼3 years after recruitment into the Million Women Study. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for renal cell carcinoma associated with beverage consumption adjusted for age, region of residence, socioeconomic status, smoking, and body mass index. RESULTS: After an average of 5.2 years of follow-up, 588 cases of renal cell carcinoma were identified among 779,369 women. While alcohol intake was associated with a reduced risk of renal cell carcinoma (RR for ≥ 2 vs <1 drink per day: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.61-0.96; P for trend=0.02), there was no association with total fluid intake (RR for ≥ 12 vs <7 drinks per day: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.91-1.45; P for trend=0.3) or with intakes of specific beverages. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent protective effect of alcohol on the risk of renal cell carcinoma is unlikely to be related to a high fluid intake.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Beverages/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/prevention & control , Drinking , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Coffee , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Diet Surveys , Feeding Behavior , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tea , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Water
2.
Br J Cancer ; 100(11): 1817-23, 2009 Jun 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19436304

ABSTRACT

We examined plasma concentrations of phyto-oestrogens in relation to risk for subsequent prostate cancer in a case-control study nested in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Concentrations of isoflavones genistein, daidzein and equol, and that of lignans enterolactone and enterodiol, were measured in plasma samples for 950 prostate cancer cases and 1042 matched control participants. Relative risks (RRs) for prostate cancer in relation to plasma concentrations of these phyto-oestrogens were estimated by conditional logistic regression. Higher plasma concentrations of genistein were associated with lower risk of prostate cancer: RR among men in the highest vs the lowest fifth, 0.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.96, P trend=0.03). After adjustment for potential confounders this RR was 0.74 (95% CI 0.54-1.00, P trend=0.05). No statistically significant associations were observed for circulating concentrations of daidzein, equol, enterolactone or enterodiol in relation to overall risk for prostate cancer. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in these results by age at blood collection or country of recruitment, nor by cancer stage or grade. These results suggest that higher concentrations of circulating genistein may reduce the risk of prostate cancer but do not support an association with plasma lignans.


Subject(s)
Diet , Phytoestrogens/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Europe , Genistein/blood , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
3.
Br J Cancer ; 90(7): 1392-6, 2004 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15054461

ABSTRACT

In view of the experimental evidence suggesting that the micronutrient selenium reduces prostate cancer risk, we investigated the association between the selenium level in fingernails, a measure of long-term selenium intake, and prostate cancer risk in a case-control study among 656 British men, conducted in 1989-1992. Nail clippings were taken at the time of recruitment and selenium concentration, measured using neutron activation techniques, was successfully assayed for 300 case-control pairs and varied six-fold among the controls (0.59 p.p.m.; interquartile range, 0.50-0.71 p.p.m.). Nail selenium concentration was not significantly associated with prostate cancer risk: men in the highest quartile of nail selenium had a slightly increased risk compared with men in the lowest quartile (OR 1.24, 95 CI, 0.73-2.10); for advanced prostate cancer, men in the highest quartile had a slightly reduced risk compared with men in the lowest quartile (OR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.27-2.25). These results suggest that selenium is not strongly associated with prostate cancer risk in British men.


Subject(s)
Nails/chemistry , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Selenium/analysis , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Dietary Supplements , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk , Smoking , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Vitamin E/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL