ABSTRACT
Mutations in KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 were originally described in infants with benign familial neonatal seizures (BFNS). Recently, KCNQ2 mutations have also been shown to cause epileptic encephalopathy. This report describes three infants carrying abnormalities of KCNQ2 and one infant with a KCNQ3 mutation. The different KCNQ2 abnormalities led to different phenotypes and included a novel intragenic duplication, c.419_430dup, in an infant with BFNS, a 0.761Mb 20q13.3 contiguous gene deletion in an infant with seizures at 3 months, and a recurrent de novo missense mutation c.881C>T in a neonate with "KCNQ2-encephalopathy." The mutation in KCNQ3, c.989G>A, was novel and occurred in an infant with BFNS. KCNQ-related seizures often present with tonic/clonic manifestations, cyanosis, or apnea. Certain genotype-phenotype correlations help predict outcome. Similarly affected family members suggests benign familial "KCNQ-related" epilepsy, whereas neonatal seizures with unexplained multifocal epileptiform discharges or burst suppression on electroencephalography, and acute abnormalities of the basal ganglia/thalami are suggestive of KCNQ2-encephalopathy, which is often sporadic. 20q13.33 contiguous gene deletion encompassing KCNQ2 may harbor atypical features depending on deletion size. Although the phenotype often guides direct targeted gene testing in these conditions, array CGH should also be considered in suspected sporadic or atypical familial cases to diagnose 20q13.33 deletion.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy/genetics , KCNQ Potassium Channels/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Basal Ganglia/pathology , Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22/genetics , Electroencephalography , Female , Genetic Association Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Phenotype , Thalamus/pathologyABSTRACT
Status dystonicus is a rare, but life-threatening movement disorder emergency. Urgent assessment is required and management is tailored to patient characteristics and complications. The use of dystonia action plans and early recognition of worsening dystonia may potentially facilitate intervention or prevent progression to status dystonicus. However, for established status dystonicus, rapidly deployed temporizing measures and different depths of sedation in an intensive care unit or high dependency unit are the most immediate and effective modalities for abating life-threatening spasms, while dystonia-specific treatment takes effect. If refractory status dystonicus persists despite orally active anti-dystonia drugs and unsuccessful weaning from sedative or anaesthetic agents, early consideration of intrathecal baclofen or deep brain stimulation is required. During status dystonicus, precise documentation of dystonia sites and severity as well as the baseline clinical state, using rating scales and videos is recommended. Further published descriptions of the clinical nature, timing of evolution, resolution, and epidemiology of status dystonicus are essential for a better collective understanding of this poorly understood heterogeneous emergency. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical presentation and suggest a management approach for status dystonicus.