Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Epilepsia ; 61(11): 2435-2441, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33084037

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare cause of severe and pharmacoresistant epileptic encephalopathy. Stiripentol (STP) has a significant therapeutic benefit in the pediatric DS population. However, STP effects on adult patients have not been well studied. In our adult STP-naive DS patient population, STP initiation was associated with encephalopathy, despite decreases in valproate and clobazam dosage. Here we explored the cause and treatment of encephalopathic manifestations associated with STP in adults. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with a confirmed clinical and genetic diagnosis of DS who attended the Adult Epilepsy Genetics Clinic were identified retrospectively. Patients who declined or discontinued STP after fewer than 3 months of use, patients who were deceased before starting STP or seizure-free when the genetic diagnosis was confirmed, and those who started STP before leaving the pediatric system (<18 years) were excluded. Levels of ammonia, carnitine, and other anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) were observed for patients receiving STP. Patients with high ammonia levels who received carnitine supplementation were reevaluated. They were also offered an increased dosage of stiripentol if treatment with carnitine improved the encephalopathy. RESULTS: We observed hyperammonemic encephalopathy in 77% of patients treated with STP. In seven of nine patients, we observed a rate of improvement in ammonia levels of 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21%-49%) at a mean carnitine dose of 991 ± 286 mg/d (range 660-1320 mg/d). Five patients whose ammonia levels normalized were also offered an increase in STP dose and they were able to tolerate higher doses with improvement in side effects. Despite such adjustments, the mean maximum stiripentol dose reached was 14.89 ± 8.72 mg/kg/d, which is lower than what is typically recommended in children (50 mg/kg/d). SIGNIFICANCE: We report hyperammonemia in adult STP-naive patients who were on valproate and clobazam, despite dose reduction of the latter drugs. We also report that treatment with carnitine improved hyperammonemia, allowing the continuation of STP.


Subject(s)
Ammonia , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Carnitine/administration & dosage , Dioxolanes/adverse effects , Epilepsies, Myoclonic/drug therapy , Hyperammonemia/chemically induced , Adult , Ammonia/blood , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Dioxolanes/administration & dosage , Epilepsies, Myoclonic/blood , Female , Humans , Hyperammonemia/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
2.
Epilepsy Res ; 108(9): 1642-51, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25223728

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Given verapamil's property as a glycoprotein inhibitor, this drug could increase the effective concentration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the epileptic foci, reducing the number of seizures. This pilot study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of verapamil as adjunct therapy in pharmacoresistant patients with focal onset seizures. METHODS: This was a single-centered, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial evaluating verapamil as an add-on therapy for adult patients with refractory epilepsy. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were randomized, but five of them withdrew and one patient passed away after consent, having no exposure to either verapamil or placebo; four patients withdrew during or after the double-blind phase due to side effects. From these four patients, only one patient was in the verapamil group. Twelve patients (59%) finished the study. Some patients experienced lower seizure frequencies, but none of them reached 50% reduction. In addition, there was no statistically significant decrease in the seizure frequency of patients receiving verapamil. When comparing the verapamil with the placebo at the double-blind or the open label study phases, the average difference in seizure range also failed to show significance (p=0.41 and p=0.98, respectively). No significant cardiovascular effects were observed, and side effects unique to verapamil were skin rashes and feet edema. Throughout the study, carbamazepine, valproic acid and clobazam levels increased following verapamil intake; minor dosage adjustment was required in one patient on carbamazepine. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study has shown mild benefits of verapamil use in comparison to placebo as an add-on therapy for a group of non-selected patients with refractory epilepsy. A partial response in a subset of patients was seen. No significant safety problems happened, but adjustments on AEDs may be required during verapamil use.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Verapamil/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL