Laboratory evaluation of potassium and creatinine among ambulatory patients prescribed spironolactone: are we monitoring for hyperkalemia?

BACKGROUND: Serum potassium and creatinine evaluation is recommended in patients prescribed spironolactone, yet the proportion of ambulatory patients chronically dispensed spironolactone receiving evaluation is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rate of potassium and creatinine evaluation and identify factors associated with conducting these tests among ambulatory patients dispensed spironolactone. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate patients at 10 health maintenance organizations with ongoing spironolactone dispensing for one year (N = 2257). Potassium and creatinine evaluation were determined from administrative data. Associations between patient characteristics and laboratory testing were assessed, using logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Serum creatinine and potassium were evaluated in 72.3% of patients during a 13 month period. The likelihood of potassium and creatinine monitoring was greater among patients who were older (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.41 per decade of life); male (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.54); had diabetes (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.31 to 2.03); received concomitant therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.74 to 2.87), potassium supplements (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.51 to 2.54), or digoxin (OR 2.10 95% CI 1.48 to 2.98); or had more outpatient visits (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.44). Among patients with heart failure (n = 790), factors associated with the incidence of laboratory testing were diabetes (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.34), outpatient visits (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.41), and digoxin therapy (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.69). CONCLUSIONS: Three-fourths of ambulatory patients dispensed spironolactone receive recommended laboratory evaluation, with monitoring more likely to be completed in patients prescribed concomitant therapy with drugs that increase hyperkalemia risk, older patients, and those with diabetes.

Estimation of the period prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease among nine health plans using computerized diagnoses and outpatient pharmacy dispensings.

BACKGROUND: There are few contemporary estimates of prevalence rates for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in diverse North American communities. METHODS: We estimated the period prevalence of IBD for January 1, 1999, through June 30, 2001, among 1.8 million randomly sampled members of nine integrated healthcare organizations in the US using computerized diagnoses and outpatient pharmaceutical dispensing. We also assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivities of 1) the case-finding algorithm, and 2) the 30-month sampling period using medical chart review and linkage to a 78-month dataset, respectively. RESULTS: The PPV of the case-finding algorithm was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78-87) and 84% (95% CI, 79-89) in two different organizations. In both, the sensitivity of the optimal algorithm, compared with the most inclusive, exceeded 90%. The sensitivity of the 30-month sampling period compared with 78 months was 61% (95% CI, 57-64) in one organization. Applying a slightly more sensitive case-finding algorithm, the average period prevalence of IBD across the nine organizations, standardized to the age- and gender-distribution of the US population, 2000 census, was 388 cases (95% CI, 378-397) per 100,000 persons (range 209-784 per 100,000; average follow-up 26 months). The prevalence of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and unspecified IBD was 129, 191, and 69 per 100,000, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The observed average prevalence was similar to prevalence proportions reported for other North American populations (369-408 per 100,000). Additional research is needed to understand differences in the occurrence of IBD among diverse populations as well as practice variation in diagnosis and treatment of IBD.

Baseline laboratory monitoring of cardiovascular medications in elderly health maintenance organization enrollees.

OBJECTIVES: To identify correlates of laboratory monitoring errors in elderly health maintenance organization (HMO) members at the initiation of therapy with cardiovascular medications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study in 10 HMOs. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: From a 2 million-member sample, individuals aged 65 and older who received one of seven cardiovascular medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), amiodarone, digoxin, diuretics, potassium supplements, and statins) and did not have recommended baseline monitoring performed during the 180 days before or 14 days after the index dispensing. MEASUREMENTS: The proportion of members receiving each drug for whom recommended laboratory monitoring was not performed. Laboratory monitoring error rates stratified by sex, age group, chronic disease score, and HMO site were examined, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of laboratory monitoring errors. RESULTS: Error rates varied by medication class, ranging from 23% of patients receiving potassium supplementation without serum potassium and serum creatinine monitoring to 58% of patients receiving amiodarone who did not have recommended monitoring for thyroid and liver function. Highest error rates occurred in the youngest elderly for ACE inhibitors, ARBs, digoxin, diuretics, and potassium supplements, although in patients receiving amiodarone and statins, errors were most frequent in the oldest elderly. Errors occurred more frequently in patients with less comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Laboratory monitoring errors occurred frequently in elderly HMO members at the initiation of therapy with cardiovascular medications. Further study must examine the association between these errors and adverse outcomes.

Prescription drug use in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide information on the prevalence of the use of prescription drugs among pregnant women in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted with the use of the automated databases of 8 health maintenance organizations that are involved in the Health Maintenance Research Network Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics. Women who delivered of an infant in a hospital from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2000, were identified. Prescription drug use according to therapeutic class and the United States Food and Drug Administration risk classification system was evaluated, with the assumption of a gestational duration of 270 days, with three 90-day trimesters of pregnancy, and with a 90-day period before pregnancy. Nonprescription drug use was not assessed. RESULTS: During the period 1996 through 2000, 152,531 deliveries were identified that met the criteria for study. For 98,182 deliveries (64%), a drug other than a vitamin or mineral supplement was prescribed in the 270 days before delivery: 3595 women (2.4%) received a drug from category A; 76,292 women (50.0%) received a drug from category B; 57,604 women (37.8%) received a drug from category C; 7333 women (4.8%) received a drug from category D, and 6976 women (4.6%) received a drug from category X of the United States Food and Drug Administration risk classification system. Overall, 5157 women (3.4%) received a category D drug, and 1653 women (1.1%) received a category X drug after the initial prenatal care visit. CONCLUSION: Our finding that almost one half of all pregnant women received prescription drugs from categories C, D, or X of the United States Food and Drug Administration risk classification system highlights the importance of the need to understand the effects of these medications on the developing fetus and on the pregnant woman.