Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Rev Saude Publica ; 51(suppl 2): 18s, 2017 Nov 13.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29160464

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the use of medicines by patients of the primary health care of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, exploratory, and descriptive study, part of the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos - Serviços, 2015 (PNAUM - National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines - Services, 2015). Interviews were carried out with patients present in the services by semi-structured questionnaires. Sociodemographic, clinical, and use of medicines variables were assessed and the use of medicines in the 30 days prior to the interview was also verified. The population was stratified into three age groups: 18 to 44, 45 to 64, and 65 years or more. The differences between the age groups were verified using the Student's t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for the categorical ones. The complex samples analysis plan was employed. The medicines were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. RESULTS: Of the 8,803 patients interviewed, 6,511 (76.2%) reported to have used medicines in the 30 days prior to the interview. On average, each patient used 2.32 medicines, without difference between the sexes. Among medicine users, 18.2% were aged 65 years or more. Compared to the other age groups, older adults presented more comorbidities, used more medicines, and self-reported worse health conditions. They were also less educated, reported worse economic situation, and lived alone. The medicines that were mostly used were "other analgesics and antipyretics" (3rd ATC level) and Losartan (5th ATC level). CONCLUSIONS: Most medicine users had lower education level and presented comorbidities. The most used medicines were the antihypertensive ones. Self-medication was higher among young people. Most patients reported to use generic medicines. The average number of medicines and the prevalence of use increased with age. Due to the characteristics observed and the difficulties in the use of medicines, older adults are in a situation of greater vulnerability.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage , Primary Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs , Self Medication , Sex Distribution , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
2.
Rev Saude Publica ; 51(suppl 2): 20s, 2017 Nov 13.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29160463

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the access to medicines in primary health care of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), from the patients' perspective. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that used data from the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos - Services, 2015 (PNAUM - National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines), conducted by interviews with 8,591 patients in cities of the five regions of Brazil. Evaluation of access to medicines used concepts proposed by Penshansky and Thomas (1981), according to the dimensions: availability, accessibility, accommodation, acceptability, and affordability. Each dimension was evaluated by its own indicators. RESULTS: For the "availability" dimension, 59.8% of patients reported having full access to medicines, without significant difference between regions. For "accessibility," 60% of patients declared that the basic health unit (UBS) was not far from their house, 83% said it was very easy/easy to get to the UBS, and most patients reported that they go walking (64.5%). For "accommodation," UBS was evaluated as very good/good for the items "comfort" (74.2%) and "cleanliness" (90.9%), and 70.8% of patients reported that they do not wait to receive their medicines, although the average waiting time was 32.9 minutes. For "acceptability," 93.1% of patients reported to be served with respect and courtesy by the staff of the dispensing units and 90.5% declared that the units' service was very good/good. For "affordability," 13% of patients reported not being able to buy something important to cover expenses with health problems, and 41.8% of participants pointed out the expense with medicines. CONCLUSIONS: Results show 70%-90% compliance, which is compatible with developed countries. However, access to medicines remains a challenge, because it is still heavily compromised by the low availability of essential medicines in public health units, showing that it does not occur universally, equally, and decisively to the population.


Subject(s)
Drugs, Essential/supply & distribution , Pharmaceutical Services/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , National Health Programs
3.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 51(supl.2): 18s, 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-903409

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To characterize the use of medicines by patients of the primary health care of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS This is a cross-sectional, exploratory, and descriptive study, part of the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos - Serviços, 2015 (PNAUM - National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines - Services, 2015). Interviews were carried out with patients present in the services by semi-structured questionnaires. Sociodemographic, clinical, and use of medicines variables were assessed and the use of medicines in the 30 days prior to the interview was also verified. The population was stratified into three age groups: 18 to 44, 45 to 64, and 65 years or more. The differences between the age groups were verified using the Student's t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for the categorical ones. The complex samples analysis plan was employed. The medicines were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. RESULTS Of the 8,803 patients interviewed, 6,511 (76.2%) reported to have used medicines in the 30 days prior to the interview. On average, each patient used 2.32 medicines, without difference between the sexes. Among medicine users, 18.2% were aged 65 years or more. Compared to the other age groups, older adults presented more comorbidities, used more medicines, and self-reported worse health conditions. They were also less educated, reported worse economic situation, and lived alone. The medicines that were mostly used were "other analgesics and antipyretics" (3rd ATC level) and Losartan (5th ATC level). CONCLUSIONS Most medicine users had lower education level and presented comorbidities. The most used medicines were the antihypertensive ones. Self-medication was higher among young people. Most patients reported to use generic medicines. The average number of medicines and the prevalence of use increased with age. Due to the characteristics observed and the difficulties in the use of medicines, older adults are in a situation of greater vulnerability.


RESUMO OBJETIVO Caracterizar o perfil de utilização de medicamentos pelos usuários da Atenção Primária do Sistema Único de Saúde no Brasil. MÉTODOS Estudo transversal, exploratório, de natureza descritiva, integrante da Pesquisa Nacional Sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos - Serviços, 2015. Foram realizadas entrevistas com usuários presentes nos serviços por meio de questionários semiestruturados. Foram avaliadas as variáveis sociodemográficas, clínicas e relacionadas ao uso de medicamentos e verificado o uso de medicamentos nos 30 dias anteriores à entrevista. A população foi estratificada em três faixas etárias: 18 a 44, 45 a 64 e 65 anos ou mais. As diferenças entre as faixas etárias foram verificadas por meio do teste t de Student para variáveis contínuas e teste qui-quadrado para categóricas. Utilizou-se o plano de análises de amostras complexas. Os medicamentos foram classificados conforme Anatomical Therapeutical Chemical Classification System. RESULTADOS De 8.803 usuários entrevistados, 6.511 (76,2%) relataram uso de medicamentos nos 30 dias anteriores à entrevista. Em média, cada usuário utilizou 2,32 medicamentos, sem diferença entre os sexos. Dentre os usuários de medicamentos, 18,2% tinham 65 anos de idade ou mais. Em comparação com as demais faixas etárias os idosos apresentaram mais comorbidades, usaram mais medicamentos e autorrelataram pior condição de saúde; eram menos escolarizados, relataram pior situação econômica e viviam sozinhos. Os medicamentos mais utilizados foram "outros analgésicos e antipiréticos" (3º nível ATC) e losartana (5º nível ATC). CONCLUSÕES A maioria dos usuários de medicamentos possuía baixa escolaridade e comorbidades. Os medicamentos mais utilizados foram os anti-hipertensivos. A automedicação foi maior entre os jovens. A maioria dos usuários relatou utilização de medicamentos genéricos. O número médio de medicamentos e a prevalência de uso aumentaram com a idade. Devido às características observadas e as dificuldades no uso de medicamentos, os idosos estão em situação de maior vulnerabilidade.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Primary Health Care , Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Self Medication , Socioeconomic Factors , Brazil , Sex Factors , Cross-Sectional Studies , Interviews as Topic , Health Surveys , Sex Distribution , Middle Aged , National Health Programs
4.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 51(supl.2): 20s, 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-903401

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate the access to medicines in primary health care of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), from the patients' perspective. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study that used data from the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos - Services, 2015 (PNAUM - National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines), conducted by interviews with 8,591 patients in cities of the five regions of Brazil. Evaluation of access to medicines used concepts proposed by Penshansky and Thomas (1981), according to the dimensions: availability, accessibility, accommodation, acceptability, and affordability. Each dimension was evaluated by its own indicators. RESULTS For the "availability" dimension, 59.8% of patients reported having full access to medicines, without significant difference between regions. For "accessibility," 60% of patients declared that the basic health unit (UBS) was not far from their house, 83% said it was very easy/easy to get to the UBS, and most patients reported that they go walking (64.5%). For "accommodation," UBS was evaluated as very good/good for the items "comfort" (74.2%) and "cleanliness" (90.9%), and 70.8% of patients reported that they do not wait to receive their medicines, although the average waiting time was 32.9 minutes. For "acceptability," 93.1% of patients reported to be served with respect and courtesy by the staff of the dispensing units and 90.5% declared that the units' service was very good/good. For "affordability," 13% of patients reported not being able to buy something important to cover expenses with health problems, and 41.8% of participants pointed out the expense with medicines. CONCLUSIONS Results show 70%-90% compliance, which is compatible with developed countries. However, access to medicines remains a challenge, because it is still heavily compromised by the low availability of essential medicines in public health units, showing that it does not occur universally, equally, and decisively to the population.


RESUMO OBJETIVO Avaliar o acesso aos medicamentos na Atenção Primária em Saúde do Sistema Único de Saúde na perspectiva do usuário. MÉTODOS Estudo transversal que utilizou dados da Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional no Brasil - Serviços, 2015, realizado por meio de entrevistas com 8.591 usuários em municípios das cinco regiões do Brasil. A avaliação do acesso aos medicamentos utilizou conceitos propostos por Penshansky e Thomas (1981), segundo as dimensões: disponibilidade, acessibilidade geográfica, adequação, aceitabilidade e capacidade aquisitiva. Cada uma das dimensões foi avaliada por meio de indicadores próprios. RESULTADOS Para dimensão disponibilidade, 59,8% dos usuários declararam ter acesso total aos medicamentos, sem diferença significante entre regiões. Para acessibilidade geográfica, 60% dos usuários declararam que a unidade básica de saúde não ficava longe de sua residência, 83% afirmaram ser muito fácil/fácil chegar até a unidade e a maioria dos usuários relatou caminhar (64,5%). Para adequação, a unidade foi avaliada como muito bom/bom para os itens conforto (74,2%) e limpeza (90,9%), e 70,8% dos usuários relataram não ter de esperar para retirar seus medicamentos, embora o tempo médio de espera tenha sido 32,9 minutos. Para aceitabilidade: 93,1% dos usuários relataram ser atendidos com respeito e cortesia pelos funcionários das unidades dispensadoras e 90,5% declararam ser muito bom/bom o atendimento das unidades. Para capacidade aquisitiva 13% dos usuários relataram ter deixado de comprar algo importante para cobrir gastos com problemas de saúde, 41,8% dos participantes apontaram a despesa com medicamentos. CONCLUSÕES Os resultados mostram 70%-90% de conformidade, compatível com países desenvolvidos. No entanto, o acesso aos medicamentos continua sendo um desafio pois ainda é fortemente comprometido pela baixa disponibilidade de medicamentos essenciais em unidades públicas de saúde, demonstrando que não ocorre de forma universal, equânime e resolutiva à população.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pharmaceutical Services/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care , Drugs, Essential/supply & distribution , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Services Accessibility , National Health Programs
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL