Valproic acid as adjuvant treatment for convulsive status epilepticus: a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Generalised convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a medical emergency. Guidelines recommend a stepwise strategy of benzodiazepines followed by a second-line anti-seizure medicine (ASM). However, GCSE is uncontrolled in 20-40% patients and is associated with protracted hospitalisation, disability, and mortality. The objective was to determine whether valproic acid (VPA) as complementary treatment to the stepwise strategy improves the outcomes of patients with de novo established GCSE. METHODS: This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in 244 adults admitted to intensive care units for GCSE in 16 French hospitals between 2013 and 2018. Patients received standard care of benzodiazepine and a second-line ASM (except VPA). Intervention patients received a 30 mg/kg VPA loading dose, then a 1 mg/kg/h 12 h infusion, whilst the placebo group received an identical intravenous administration of 0.9% saline as a bolus and continuous infusion. Primary outcome was proportion of patients discharged from hospital by day 15. The secondary outcomes were seizure control, adverse events, and cognition at day 90. RESULTS: A total of 126 (52%) and 118 (48%) patients were included in the VPA and placebo groups. 224 (93%) and 227 (93%) received a first-line and a second-line ASM before VPA or placebo infusion. There was no between-group difference for patients hospital-discharged at day 15 [VPA, 77 (61%) versus placebo, 72 (61%), adjusted relative risk 1.04; 95% confidence interval (0.89-1.19); p = 0.58]. There were no between-group differences for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: VPA added to the recommended strategy for adult GCSE is well tolerated but did not increase the proportion of patients hospital-discharged by day 15. TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: NCT01791868 (ClinicalTrials.gov registry), registered: 15 February 2012.

Reassessment of mitochondrial cyclophilin D as a target for improving cardiac arrest outcomes in the era of therapeutic hypothermia.

Uncertainty exists regarding whether cyclophilin D (CypD), a mitochondrial matrix protein that plays a key role in ischemia-reperfusion injury, can be a pharmacological target for improving outcomes after cardiac arrest (CA), especially when therapeutic hypothermia is used. Using CypD knockout mice (CypD-/-), we investigated the effects of loss of CypD on short-term and medium-term outcomes after CA. CypD-/- mice or their wild-type (WT) littermates underwent either 5 minute CA followed by resuscitation with and/or without hypothermia at 33°C-34°C (targeted temperature reached within minutes after resuscitation), or a sham procedure. Brain and cardiac injury were assessed using echocardiography, neurological scores, MRI and biomarkers. Seven day survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The rate of restoration of spontaneous circulation was significantly higher in CypD-/- mice (with shorter cardiac massage duration) than in WT mice (P < 0.05). Loss of CypD significantly attenuated CA-induced release of troponin and S100ß protein, and limited myocardial dysfunction at 150 minutes after CA. Loss of CypD combined with hypothermia led to the best neurological and MRI scores at 24 hours and highest survival rates at 7 days compared to other groups (P < 0.05). In animals successfully resuscitated, loss of CypD had no benefits on day 7 survival while hypothermia was highly protective. Pharmacological inhibition of CypD with cyclosporine A combined with hypothermia provided similar day 7 survival than loss of CypD combined with hypothermia. CypD is a viable target to improve success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation but its inhibition is unlikely to improve long-term outcomes, unless therapeutic hypothermia is associated.